Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability

被引:211
作者
Li, Yuhong [1 ]
Chen, Kedong [1 ]
Collignon, Stephane [2 ]
Ivanov, Dmitry [3 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Berlin Sch Econ & Law, Dept Business Adm, Supply Chain & Operat Management, Badensche Str 50-51, D-10825 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Ripple Effect; Forward disruption propagation; Backward disruption propagation; Supply chain network; Resilience investment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.053
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A local disruption can propagate to forward and downward through the material flow and eventually influence the entire supply chain network (SCN). This phenomenon of ripple effect, immensely existing in practice, has received great interest in recent years. Moreover, forward and backward disruption propagations became major stressors for SCNs during the COVID-19 pandemic triggered by simultaneous and sequential supply and demand disruptions. However, current literature has paid less attention to the different impacts of the directions of disruption propagation. This study examines the disruption propagation through simulating simple interaction rules of firms inside the SCN. Specifically, an agentbased computational model is developed to delineate the supply chain disruption propagation behavior. Then, we conduct multi-level quantitative analysis to explore the effects of forward and backward disruption propagation, moderated by network structure, network-level health and node-level vulnerability. Our results demonstrate that it is practically important to differentiate between forward and backward disruption propagation, as they are distinctive in the associated mitigation strategies and in the effects on network and individual firm performance. Forward disruption propagation generally can be mitigated by substitute and backup supply and has greater impact on firms serving the assembly role and on the supply/assembly networks, whereas backward disruption propagation is normally mitigated by flexible operation and distribution and has bigger impact on firms serving the distribution role and on distribution networks. We further analyze the investment strategies in a dual-focal supply network under disruption propagation. We provide propositions to facilitate decision-making and summarize important managerial implications. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1131
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
[51]  
NGUYEN WPV, 2019, INT J PROD RES, V117, P1
[52]  
Norrman A., 2004, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V34, P434, DOI 10.1108/09600030410545463
[53]  
OJHA R, 2018, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V56, P5795
[54]  
OTTO C, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V83, P232
[55]   Collaborative Situational Awareness for Conflict-Aware Flight Planning [J].
Paul, Saswata ;
Patterson, Stacy ;
Varela, Carlos A. .
2020 AIAA/IEEE 39TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC) PROCEEDINGS, 2020,
[56]   Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics [J].
Pavlov, Alexander ;
Ivanov, Dmitry ;
Pavlov, Dmitry ;
Slinko, Alexey .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025, 349 (02) :495-524
[57]   ENSURING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK [J].
Pettit, Timothy J. ;
Fiksel, Joseph ;
Croxton, Keely L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2010, 31 (01) :1-+
[58]  
QAZI A, 2017, J BUS LOGIST, V259, P189
[59]   Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review [J].
Queiroz, Maciel M. ;
Ivanov, Dmitry ;
Dolgui, Alexandre ;
Fosso Wamba, Samuel .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 319 (01) :1159-1196
[60]  
Sawik T., 2020, Supply Chain Disruption Management, Using Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming, V2nd