Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research

被引:71
作者
Kim, Jihoon [1 ]
Kim, Hyeoneui [2 ]
Bell, Elizabeth [3 ]
Bath, Tyler [1 ]
Paul, Paulina [1 ]
Pham, Anh [1 ]
Jiang, Xiaoqian [4 ]
Zheng, Kai [5 ]
Ohno-Machado, Lucila [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Biomed Informat, 9500 Gilman Dr,Mail Code 0728, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC USA
[3] Calif State Univ San Marcos, Off Grad Studies & Res, San Marcos, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Biomed Informat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Informat, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Vet Affairs San Diego Healthcare Syst, Div Hlth Serv Res & Dev, La Jolla, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BROAD CONSENT; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Patients increasingly demand transparency in and control of how their medical records and biospecimens are shared for research. How much they are willing to share and what factors influence their sharing preferences remain understudied in real settings. OBJECTIVES To examine whether and how various presentations of consent forms are associated with differences in electronic health record and biospecimen sharing rates and whether these rates vary according to user interface design, data recipients, data and biospecimen items, and patient characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this survey study, a data and biospecimen sharing preference survey was conducted at 2 academic hospitals from May 1, 2017, to September 31, 2018, after simple randomization of patients to 1 of 4 options with different layout and formats of indicating sharing preferences: opt-in simple, opt-in detailed, opt-out simple, and opt-out detailed. INTERVENTIONS All participants were presented with a list of data and biospecimen items that could be shared for research within the same health care organization or with other nonprofit or for-profit institutions. Participating patients were randomly asked to select the items that they would share (opt-in) or were asked to select items they would not share (opt-out). Patients in these 2 groups were further randomized to select only among 18 categories vs 59 detailed items (simple vs detailed form layout). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end points were the percentages of patients willing to share data and biospecimen categories or items. RESULTS Among 1800 eligible participants, 1246 (69.2%) who completed their data sharing survey were included in the analysis, and 850 of these patients (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [16.7] years; 507 [59.6%] female; 677 [79.6%] white) responded to the satisfaction survey. A total of 46 participants (3.7%) declined sharing with the home institution, 352 (28.3%) with nonprofit institutions, and 590 (47.4%) with for-profit institutions. A total of 836 (67.1%) indicated that they would share all items with researchers from the home institution. When comparing opt-out with opt-in interfaces, all 59 sharing choice variables (100%) were associated with the sharing decision. When comparing simple with detailed forms, only 14 variables (23.7%) were associated with the sharing decision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that most patients are willing to share their data and biospecimens for research. Allowing patients to decide with whom they want to share certain types of data may affect research that involves secondary use of electronic health records and/or biosamples for research.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WASHINGTON POST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
[3]   Secondary data sources for health services research in urologic oncology [J].
Cole, Alexander P. ;
Friedlander, David F. ;
Quoc-Dien Trinh .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (04) :165-173
[4]   Methods for the de-identification of electronic health records for genomic research [J].
El Emam, Khaled .
GENOME MEDICINE, 2011, 3
[5]   A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States [J].
Garrison, Nanibaa' A. ;
Sathe, Nila A. ;
Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny ;
Holm, Ingrid A. ;
Sanderson, Saskia C. ;
Smith, Maureen E. ;
McPheeters, Melissa L. ;
Clayton, Ellen W. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (07) :663-671
[6]  
GRANVILLE K, 2018, NY TIMES
[7]   iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research [J].
Kim, Hyeoneui ;
Bell, Elizabeth ;
Kim, Jihoon ;
Sitapati, Amy ;
Ramsdell, Joe ;
Farcas, Claudiu ;
Friedman, Dexter ;
Feupe, Stephanie Feudjio ;
Ohno-Machado, Lucila .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (02) :380-387
[8]   Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish and English: A Comparable Test of Health Literacy for Spanish and English Speakers [J].
Lee, Shoou-Yih Daniel ;
Stucky, Brian D. ;
Lee, Jessica Y. ;
Rozier, R. Gary ;
Bender, Deborah E. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 45 (04) :1105-1120
[9]  
MacMillan D., 2018, Wall Street Journal
[10]   Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing [J].
Mello, Michelle M. ;
Lieou, Van ;
Goodman, Steven N. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (23) :2202-2211