Student Perceptions of Independent Versus Facilitated Small Group Learning Approaches to Compressed Medical Anatomy Education

被引:47
作者
Whelan, Alexander [1 ]
Leddy, John J. [2 ]
Mindra, Sean [1 ]
Hughes, J. D. Matthew [1 ]
El-Bialy, Safaa [3 ]
Ramnanan, Christopher J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Cellular & Mol Med, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Innovat Med Educ, Div Clin & Funct Anat, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
关键词
gross anatomy education; undergraduate medical education; team-based learning; prosection-based laboratory; modern anatomical education; GROSS-ANATOMY; TEACHING ANATOMY; CURRICULUM; INTEGRATION; SCIENCES; OUTCOMES; IMPLEMENTATION; MODERNIZATION; PERFORMANCE; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ase.1544
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare student perceptions regarding two, small group learning approaches to compressed (46.5 prosection-based laboratory hours), integrated anatomy education at the University of Ottawa medical program. In the facilitated active learning (FAL) approach, tutors engage students and are expected to enable and balance both active learning and progression through laboratory objectives. In contrast, the emphasized independent learning (EIL) approach stresses elements from the "flipped classroom" educational model: prelaboratory preparation, independent laboratory learning, and limited tutor involvement. Quantitative (Likert-style questions) and qualitative data (independent thematic analysis of open-ended commentary) from a survey of students who had completed the preclerkship curriculum identified strengths from the EIL (promoting student collaboration and communication) and FAL (successful progression through objectives) approaches. However, EIL led to student frustration related to a lack of direction and impaired completion of objectives, whereas active learning opportunities in FAL were highly variable and dependent on tutor teaching style. A "hidden curriculum" was also identified, where students (particularly EIL and clerkship students) commonly compared their compressed anatomy education or their anatomy learning environment with other approaches. Finally, while both groups highly regarded the efficiency of prosection-based learning and expressed value for cadaveric-based learning, student commentary noted that the lack of grade value dedicated to anatomy assessment limited student accountability. This study revealed critical insights into small group learning in compressed anatomy education, including the need to balance student active learning opportunities with appropriate direction and feedback (including assessment). (C) 2015 American Association of Anatomists.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 51
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course [J].
Azzi, Alain J. ;
Ramnanan, Christopher J. ;
Smith, Jennifer ;
Dionne, Eric ;
Jalali, Alireza .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 8 (05) :413-420
[2]   Classic Versus Millennial Medical Lab Anatomy [J].
Benninger, Brion ;
Matsler, Nik ;
Delamarter, Taylor .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2014, 27 (07) :988-993
[3]   Objective and Subjective Assessment of Reciprocal Peer Teaching in Medical Gross Anatomy Laboratory [J].
Bentley, Brian S. ;
Hill, Robert V. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 2 (04) :143-149
[4]   Self-Guided Clinical Cases for Medical Students Based on Postmortem CT Scans of Cadavers [J].
Bohl, Michael ;
Francois, Webster ;
Gest, Thomas .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2011, 24 (05) :655-663
[5]   Integration of Gross Anatomy in an Organ System-Based Medical Curriculum: Strategies and Challenges [J].
Brooks, William S. ;
Woodley, Kristina T. C. Panizzi ;
Jackson, James R. ;
Hoesley, Craig J. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 8 (03) :266-274
[6]  
Burt R.S., 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[7]   Anatomy in medical education: Perceptions of undergraduate medical students [J].
Chapman, Stephen J. ;
Hakeem, Abdul R. ;
Marangoni, Gabriele ;
Prasad, K. R. .
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2013, 195 (05) :409-414
[8]   Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools [J].
Craig, Steven ;
Tait, Noel ;
Boers, David ;
McAndrew, Darryl .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (04) :212-216
[9]   Changes in anatomy instruction and USMLE performance: Empirical evidence on the absence of a relationship [J].
Cuddy, Monica M. ;
Swanson, David B. ;
Drake, Richard L. ;
Pawlina, Wojciech .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 6 (01) :3-10
[10]   Incentive structure in team-based learning: graded versus ungraded Group Application exercises [J].
Deardorff, Adam S. ;
Moore, Jeremy A. ;
McCormick, Colleen ;
Koles, Paul G. ;
Borges, Nicole J. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2014, 11