PI-RADSv2: How We Do It

被引:15
作者
Greer, Matthew D. [1 ,2 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY; RADS VERSION 2; SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE-CANCER; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; LOCAL STAGING ACCURACY; FUSION-GUIDED BIOPSY; ENDORECTAL COIL; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR-DETECTION;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25645
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Much criticism has been leveled at screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, yet there is no suitable replacement to improve the detection of clinically significant cancer (CSC). Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) combined with mpMRI-guided biopsies is one possible solution, as it reduces detection of low-grade disease and increases detection of CSC. However, mpMRI is critically limited by lack of standardization across institutions and low interobserver agreement. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) aims to address these concerns. We discuss the clinical and technical considerations for implementing PI-RADSv2, how we have adapted to PI-RADSv2, and review current research. While PI-RADSv2 represents a major step forward for standardizing prostate mpMRI, it does not provide a level of standardization that is routine with clinical blood tests and reader reproducibility remains an issue. Future research should seek to further improve quality assurance of mpMRI building on the important contributions of PI-RADSv2.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging
    Akin, Oguz
    Sala, Evis
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Kuroiwa, Kentaro
    Ishill, Nicole M.
    Pucar, Darko
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) : 784 - 792
  • [2] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [3] [Anonymous], RADIOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1148/RADIOL.2015142818
  • [4] [Anonymous], RADIOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1148/RADIOL.2016152542
  • [5] [Anonymous], WORLD J UROL
  • [6] [Anonymous], AM UROLOGICAL ASS AU
  • [7] [Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
  • [8] Validation of PI-RADS v.2 for prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI at 3T using an external phased-array coil
    Baldisserotto, Matteo
    Dornelles Neto, Eurico J.
    Carvalhal, Gustavo
    de Toledo, Aloyso F.
    de Almeida, Clovis M.
    Cairoli, Carlos E. D.
    de Silva, Daniel O.
    Carvalhal, Eduardo
    Paganin, Ricardo P.
    Agra, Alexandre
    de Santos, Francisco S.
    Noronha, Jorge A. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1354 - 1359
  • [9] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [10] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757