The conflicting importance of shrubby landscape structures for the reproductive success of the yellow mongoose (Cynictis penicillata)

被引:20
作者
Blaum, Niels
Rossmanith, Eva
Fleissner, Guenther
Jeltsch, Florian
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Plant Ecol & Nat Conservat, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Frankfurt, Dept Zool, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
carnivore; Cynictis penicillata; Kalahari; savanna; semiarid ecosystem; shrub encroachment; species diversity; structural diversity; vegetation structures;
D O I
10.1644/05-MAMM-A-314R3.1
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Shrub encroachment as a result of heavy grazing is assumed to affect species diversity negatively. However, shrubs may be important for animals because they provide shelter and nesting sites. In this study we analyzed the importance of shrubs as habitat structures at 3 spatial scales for yellow mongooses (Cynictis penicillata) in southern Kalahari rangelands. At burrow location we assumed shrubs reduce predation risk for occupants of burrows under shrubs and that shrubs protect burrows from trampling by larger herbivores. To investigate this, at microhabitat scale, we recorded the location of 24 reproductive and 112 sheltering burrows. However, in shrub-encroached areas prey availability is low. We surveyed vegetation cover and the spatial distribution of shrubs at mesoscale (I ha) and compared it to random surveys. Group size and reproductive success were determined for 18 groups and related to shrub cover at territory scale (macroscale, 250 ha). Our results show that yellow mongooses prefer reproductive burrows under large Acacia shrubs if the distance to the next shrub was greater than 10 m. At mesoscale, areas with lower vegetation cover were favored. Shrub encroachment at territory scale (macroscale) affected group size negatively. A range of shrub cover between 15% and 17.5% indicates a critical upper threshold limiting reproduction. For yellow mongooses territory selection represents a trade-off between abundance of suitable shrubs for burrows (protection service) and the proportion of shrub cover at large spatial scales (reduced prey availability).
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   DIET SELECTION OF BONDED AND NONBONDED FREE-RANGING SHEEP AND CATTLE [J].
ANDERSON, DM ;
HULET, CV ;
HAMADEH, SK ;
SMITH, JN ;
MURRAY, LW .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1990, 26 (03) :231-242
[2]  
[Anonymous], LAMMERGEYER
[3]  
AVENANT NL, 1992, S AFR J WILDL RES, V22, P89
[4]  
Avenant NL, 2002, MAMM BIOL, V67, P18, DOI 10.1078/1616-5047-00002
[5]   INFLUENCES OF TREES ON SAVANNA PRODUCTIVITY - TESTS OF SHADE, NUTRIENTS, AND TREE-GRASS COMPETITION [J].
BELSKY, AJ .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (04) :922-932
[6]  
BENNETT NC, 1988, S AFR J ZOOL, V23, P189
[7]   BROWSE CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPACT OF BROWSING ON TREES AND SHRUBS IN AFRICAN SAVANNAS [J].
BERGSTROM, R .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :315-324
[8]  
Blaum N, 2004, THESIS U FRANKFURT F
[9]  
BLAUM N, IN PRESS BASIC APPL
[10]  
Bolger DT, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1230, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1230:AIUHFI]2.0.CO