EVALUATION OF THE BOD POD FOR ESTIMATING PERCENT BODY FAT IN COLLEGIATE TRACK AND FIELD FEMALE ATHLETES: A COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS

被引:40
作者
Bentzur, Keren M. [1 ]
Kravitz, Len [1 ]
Lockner, Donna W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Exercise Physiol Lab, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Nutr Dietet Program, Dept Individual Family & Community Educ, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
air-displacement plethysmography; body composition;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f196
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Bentzur, KM, Kravitz, L, and Lockner, DW. Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent body fat in collegiate track and field female athletes: a comparison of four methods. J Strength Cond Res 22(6): 1985-1991, 2008-This investigation examined the accuracy of the BOD POD on a group of Division I collegiate track and field female athletes (N = 30). Hydrostatic weighing (HW) was used as the gold standard method. Body density (Db) values obtained from the BOD POD (Db(BP)) were compared with those determined by HW (Db(HW)). Both Db values were converted to percent body fat (%BF) using the Siri equation for comparison. Percent body fat values obtained from the BOD POD (BFBP) were also compared with those obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, BFDXA) and skinfold (SF, BFSF). The validity of the BOD POD was assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the relationship between the methods was examined through Pearson correlation. Average Db(BP) was 0.00890 g.cm(-3) lower (p < 0.05) than Db(HW), resulting in a significant overestimation of % BF (p < 0.05) by the BOD POD. Values for BFDXA and BFBP also differed significantly (p < 0.05). On the other hand, BFSF and BFBP were not significantly different. The correlation between percent body fat values obtained from HW(BFHW) and BFBP was good (r = 0.88, SEE = 2.30) as well as between BFSF and BFBP (r = 0.85, SEE = 2.05). Conversely, the correlation between BFDXA and BFBP was poor (r = 0.25, SEE = 5.73). The strong correlation between BFBP and BFHW presented here suggests that the BOD POD has the potential to be used as a body composition analysis tool for female athletes. The advantages of the BOD POD over HW encourage further investigation of this instrument. However, the fact that the BOD POD and SF results did not differ significantly might suggest that the SF could be used in its place until a better rate of accuracy for this instrument is established.
引用
收藏
页码:1985 / 1991
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Comparison of the Bod Pod and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in men [J].
Ball, SD ;
Altena, TS .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 25 (03) :671-678
[2]   Comparison of Bod Pod® and DXA in female collegiate athletes [J].
Ballard, TP ;
Fafara, L ;
Vukovich, MD .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (04) :731-735
[3]  
CAMERONDONALDSO.ML, 2003, ORTHO NURSING, V22, P322
[4]   Evaluation of the BOD POD® for assessing body fat in collegiate football players [J].
Collins, MA ;
Millard-Stafford, ML ;
Sparling, PB ;
Snow, TK ;
Rosskopf, LB ;
Webb, SA ;
Omer, J .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (09) :1350-1356
[5]  
DEMPSTER P, 1995, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V27, P1692
[6]  
Dixon CB, 2005, J STRENGTH COND RES, V19, P85
[7]   Air displacement plethysmography: Validation in overweight and obese subjects [J].
Ginde, SR ;
Geliebter, A ;
Rubiano, F ;
Silva, AM ;
Wang, J ;
Heshka, S ;
Heymsfield, SB .
OBESITY RESEARCH, 2005, 13 (07) :1232-1237
[8]  
Heyward VH, 2004, APPL BODY COMPOSITIO
[9]  
Hopkinson R A, 2004, Eat Weight Disord, V9, P99
[10]   Body composition profiles of elite American heptathletes [J].
Houtkooper, LB ;
Mullins, VA ;
Going, SB ;
Brown, CH ;
Lohman, TG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT NUTRITION AND EXERCISE METABOLISM, 2001, 11 (02) :162-173