Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID): A development protocol

被引:4
作者
Jayaraman, Jayakumar [1 ]
Dhar, Vineet [2 ]
Donly, Kevin J. [1 ]
Priya, Ekta [3 ]
Innes, Nicola P. T. [4 ]
Clarkson, Jan [4 ]
Raggio, Daniela P. [5 ]
Childers, Noel [6 ]
Wright, Timothy [7 ]
King, Nigel [8 ]
Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu [3 ]
Clarke, Mike [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sch Dent, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Int Med Univ, Bukit Jalil, Malaysia
[4] Univ Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Dent, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[7] Univ North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[8] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
[9] Queens Univ Belfast, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Delphi; guidelines; Paediatric Dentistry; protocol; Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID); reporting; standards; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; STROBE STATEMENT; GUIDELINES; WASTE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; QUALITY; CONSORT;
D O I
10.1111/ipd.12569
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Reporting guidelines can improve the quality of reports of research findings. Some specialities in health care however require guidance on areas that are not captured within the existing guidelines, and this is the case for Paediatric Dentistry where no such standards are available to guide the reporting of different types of study designs. The 'Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry' (RAPID) group aims to address this need by developing guidelines on reporting elements of research of particular relevance to Paediatric Dentistry. The development of RAPID guidelines will involve a five-phase process including a Delphi study, which is an explicit consensus development method designed and implemented in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies. The guideline development process will be overseen by an Executive Group. Themes specific to areas in Paediatric Dentistry will be selected, and items to be included under each theme will be identified by members of the Executive Group reviewing at least five reports of experimental and analytical study types using existing reporting guidelines. For the Delphi study, the Executive Group will identify an international multidisciplinary RAPID Delphi Group (RDG) of approximately 60 participants including academics, Paediatric Dentists, parents, and other stakeholders. Each item will be evaluated by RDG on clarity using a dichotomous scale ('well phrased' or 'needs revision') and on suitability for inclusion in the Delphi study using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = 'definitely not include' to 9 = 'definitely include'). The items will then be included in an online Delphi study of up to four rounds, with participants invited from stakeholder groups across Paediatric Dentistry. Items scored 7 or above by at least 80% of respondents will be included in the checklist and further discussed in a face-to-face Delphi consensus meeting. Following this, the Executive Group will finalize the RAPID guidelines. The guidelines will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated at scientific meetings and conferences. All the outputs from this project will be made freely available on the RAPID website: .
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 103
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery [J].
Agha, Riaz Ahmed ;
Borrelli, Mimi R. ;
Vella-Baldacchino, Martinique ;
Thavayogan, Rachel ;
Orgill, Dennis P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 46 :198-202
[2]   Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics [J].
Bassani, Rafaela ;
Rocha Pereira, Gabriel Kalil ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Tricco, Andrea C. ;
Moher, David ;
Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2019, 82 :71-84
[3]  
Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516]
[4]   The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kerkvliet, Kate ;
Spithoff, Karen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[5]   Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols The SPIRIT-PRO Extension [J].
Calvert, Melanie ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca ;
Slade, Anita ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
King, Madeleine T. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (05) :483-494
[6]   How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Bracken, Michael B. ;
Djulbegovic, Ben ;
Garattini, Silvio ;
Grant, Jonathan ;
Guelmezoglu, A. Metin ;
Howells, David W. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Oliver, Sandy .
LANCET, 2014, 383 (9912) :156-165
[7]   Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Glasziou, Paul .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9683) :86-89
[8]   EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY: TWO DECADES AND BEYOND [J].
Chiappelli, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) :7-16
[9]   Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews [J].
Clyburne-Sherin, April V. P. ;
Thurairajah, Pravheen ;
Kapadia, Mufiza Z. ;
Sampson, Margaret ;
Chan, Winnie W. Y. ;
Offringa, Martin .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[10]  
Fffff K.F., 2010, FFFBMC MED, V8, DOI DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18FFFF