Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide removal technologies: a critical review

被引:197
作者
Terlouw, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Bauer, Christian [1 ]
Rosa, Lorenzo [2 ]
Mazzotti, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Energy & Proc Engn, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIRECT AIR CAPTURE; PYROLYSIS BIOCHAR SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; TEMPORARY-STORAGE; CROPPING SYSTEMS; C SEQUESTRATION; FARMING SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1039/d0ee03757e
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A large number of prospective climate scenarios rely on Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) technologies to limit global warming below 2 degrees C. To date, however, a comprehensive understanding of the overall life-cycle environmental impacts of CDR technologies is missing. We present a critical review on conducted Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of a comprehensive set of CDR technologies: afforestation and reforestation, biochar, soil carbon sequestration, enhanced weathering, ocean fertilisation, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and direct air carbon capture and storage. One of the key observations is that emissions avoided due to substitution of certain processes (due to system expansion in LCA) can be easily misinterpreted as negative emissions, i.e. as carbon removal from the atmosphere. Based on the observed inconsistencies and shortcomings, we recommend to interpret available CDR LCA results with caution. To improve the understanding of environmental implications of CDR deployment, we recommend (1) to conduct LCAs with multiple environmental impact categories, (2) to consider the temporal aspect of emissions in biomass-related CDR technologies, (3) to focus on so far overlooked CDR technologies, (4) to be as transparent as possible regarding methodological choices, (5) to capture environmental side-effects, and (6) to distinguish between 'avoided emissions' and 'negative emissions' - only negative emissions correspond to permanent removal from the atmosphere. We conclude that more comprehensive and rigorous LCAs are needed to help inform the design of CDR technology portfolios and to aid in anticipatory governance.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1721
页数:21
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]   Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems [J].
Adler, Paul R. ;
Del Grosso, Stephen J. ;
Parton, William J. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (03) :675-691
[2]   Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and organic cropping systems in Spain. II. Fruit tree orchards [J].
Aguilera, Eduardo ;
Guzman, Gloria ;
Alonso, Antonio .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (02) :725-737
[3]   Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Nilsson, Mans ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Hjelm, Olof ;
Hochschorner, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (2-3) :145-156
[4]   Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review [J].
Ahmad, Mahtab ;
Rajapaksha, Anushka Upamali ;
Lim, Jung Eun ;
Zhang, Ming ;
Bolan, Nanthi ;
Mohan, Dinesh ;
Vithanage, Meththika ;
Lee, Sang Soo ;
Ok, Yong Sik .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2014, 99 :19-33
[5]   Increases in soil sequestered carbon under conservation agriculture cropping decrease the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of wetland rice using life cycle assessment [J].
Alam, Md Khairul ;
Bell, Richard W. ;
Biswas, Wahidul K. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 :72-87
[6]   Back to the future: dynamic full carbon accounting applied to prospective bioenergy scenarios [J].
Albers, Ariane ;
Collet, Pierre ;
Benoist, Anthony ;
Helias, Arnaud .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (07) :1242-1258
[7]  
ANDERSSON K.B., 2016, Shipping and the environment
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ISO/TS 14067:2013: Greenhouse Gases/Carbon Footprint of Products/Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Web of Science
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ECOINVENT 3 6 ECOINV