Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening: a cohort study in England, 1998-2017

被引:18
|
作者
Clift, Ashley Kieran [1 ]
Coupland, Carol A. C. [2 ]
Hippisley-Cox, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Clin Epidemiol & Primary Care, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Med Stat Primary Care, Nottingham, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2021年 / 71卷 / 703期
关键词
cohort studies; primary health care; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; screening; GENERAL-PRACTICE; MORTALITY; RATES; CONTAMINATION; PATTERNS; TRENDS; ERSPC; LUNG;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp20X713957
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Prostate is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Interpreting the results from trials of screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is complex in terms of defining optimal prostate cancer screening policy. Aim To assess the rates of, and factors associated with, the uptake of PSA testing and opportunistic screening (that is, a PSA test in the absence of any symptoms) in England between 1998 and 2017, and to estimate the likely rates of pre-randomisation screening and contamination (that is, unscheduled screening in the 'control' arm) of the UK-based Cluster Randomised trial of PSA testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP) Design and setting Open cot net study of risen in England aged 40-75 years at cohort entry (1998-2017), undertaken using the QResearch database. Method Eligible men were followed for up to 19 years. Rates of PSA testing and opportunistic PSA screening were calculated; Cox regression was used to estimate associations. Results The cohort comprised 2 808 477 men, of whom 631 426 had a total of 1 720 855 PSA tests. The authors identified that 410 724 men had opportunistic PSA screening. Cumulative proportions of uptake of opportunistic screening in the cohort were 9.96% at 5 years', 2271% at 10 years, and 44.13% at 19 years follow-up. The potential rate of contamination in the CAP control arm was estimated at 24.50%. Conclusion A substantial number of men in England opt in to opportunistic prostate cancer screening, despite uncertainty regarding its efficacy and harms. The rate of opportunistic prostate cancer screening in the population is likely to have contaminated the CAP trial, making it difficult to interpret the results.
引用
收藏
页码:E157 / E165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer: A comparison of international guidelines on prostate-specific antigen testing
    Jackson, Sherena D.
    de la Rue, May R.
    Greenslade, Thomas P. L.
    John, Anna M.
    Wahid, Shahida
    Martin, Richard M.
    Williams, Naomi J.
    Turner, Emma L.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2022, 29 (04) : 268 - 271
  • [22] On the use of prostate-specific antigen for screening of prostate cancer in European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Schaik, Ron H.
    Blijenberg, Bert G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) : 3109 - 3119
  • [23] The Impact of Receipt of Information on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing on Screening with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test
    McCormick, Mallory E.
    Haile, Zelalem T.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2023, 38 (04) : 1313 - 1321
  • [24] Effect of body mass index on prostate-specific antigen and percentage free prostate-specific antigen: Results from a prostate cancer screening cohort of 1490 men
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Perrotte, Paul
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Duclos, Alain
    Arjane, Philippe
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [25] Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer and the risk of overt metastatic disease at presentation
    Scosyrev, Emil
    Wu, Guan
    Mohile, Supriya
    Messing, Edward M.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (23) : 5768 - 5776
  • [26] Pathology Consultation on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing
    Noguez, Jaime H.
    Fantz, Corinne R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 142 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [27] The current state of prostate-specific antigen testing
    Lewis, Ryan
    Hornberger, Brad
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2016, 29 (09): : 51 - 53
  • [28] Prostate-specific antigen screening: pro
    Loeb, Stacy
    Catalona, William J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 185 - 188
  • [29] Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Past and future
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 524 - 532
  • [30] Prostate Cancer Screening and Determining the Appropriate Prostate-Specific Antigen Cutoff Values
    Catalona, William J.
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (02): : 265 - 270