Motivations, barriers and leverage points: Exploring pathways for energy consumption reduction in Canadian commercial office buildings

被引:15
作者
Whitney, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Dreyer, Bianca C. [2 ]
Riemer, Manuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Off Res Serv, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Viessmann Ctr Engagement Res Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
Energy management; Decision-making; Systems thinking; Commercial buildings; Interviews; Canada; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; DECISION-MAKING; SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; GAP; SUSTAINABILITY; EFFICIENCY; WORKPLACE; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101687
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Buildings account for approximately 40% of global energy use and 38% of global GHG emissions, thus there is great potential for emissions reduction from this sector. Research on energy management practices in the commercial context is complicated by the inter-dependencies between key stakeholders that own/manage, operate, and occupy buildings. The authors use a systems lens to reframe energy consumption as a process within commercial buildings, emphasizing system-wide opportunities to achieve greater energy efficiency and GHG emission reduction outcomes. This approach, alongside the unique sample population of owners/managers, operators, and tenants from the same building portfolios (in the private and public sectors), is a novel contribution to the energy management literature. This article contributes to the discourse on motivations and barriers for energy management, drawing attention to the cumulative and amplified consequences of siloed decision-making regarding shared resources and infrastructure. The results of this study suggest that the purpose of a commercial building - profit generation or provision of public service - is of fundamental importance to a system-level understanding of energy management, and directly links to stakeholders' views on decision-making in the context of their roles and responsibilities. Second, there are five major modes of behaviour that can lead to increased energy management activity: 1) Regulated building improvements; 2) Voluntary building improvements; 3) Voluntary operational/management improvements; 4) Leveraging competitive advantage; and 5) Mainstreaming green. These modes of behaviour can be represented as causal feedback loops. This systems analysis offers insight into potential leverage points that may lead to energy use reductions in commercial buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [31] Gagne M., 2014, OXFORD HDB WORK ENGA, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199794911.013.020, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199794911.013.020]
  • [32] Energy upgrades as financial or strategic investment? Energy Star property owners and managers improving building energy performance
    Gliedt, Travis
    Hoicka, Christina E.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 147 : 430 - 443
  • [33] Gonzalez A, 2016, IMPACTS CAP NATURE R
  • [34] Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace
    Greaves, Martin
    Zibarras, Lara D.
    Stride, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 34 : 109 - 120
  • [35] Low carbon buildings: a solution to landlord-tenant problems?
    Greenough, Richard
    Tosoratti, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY INVESTMENT & FINANCE, 2014, 32 (04) : 415 - +
  • [36] The role of psychology and social influences in energy efficiency adoption
    Hanus, Nichole
    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
    Small, Mitchell J.
    Grossmann, Iris
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (02) : 371 - 391
  • [37] Strategic Behavior in Certifying Green Buildings: An Inquiry of the Non-building Performance Value
    Hsieh, Lin-Han Chiang
    Noonan, Douglas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 (02) : 231 - 242
  • [38] Pro-environmental Behavior in the Workplace: A Review of Empirical Studies and Directions for Future Research
    Inoue, Yuhei
    Alfaro-Barrantes, Priscila
    [J]. BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2015, 120 (01) : 137 - 160
  • [39] International Energy Agency, 2021, WORLD EN INV 2017, DOI [10.1787/9789264277854-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264277854-EN]
  • [40] THE ENERGY-EFFICIENCY GAP - WHAT DOES IT MEAN
    JAFFE, AB
    STAVINS, RN
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (10) : 804 - 810