Friends will be "friends"? The sociopragmatics of referential terms in early English letters

被引:0
作者
Nevala, Minna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
来源
CORPORA: PRAGMATICS AND DISCOURSE | 2009年 / 68期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This article studies the sociopragmatic use of the term friend in personal correspondence in Early Modern and Late Modern English, more specifically, during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The analysis shows that friend may be used, firstly, for an instrumental function, as when the writer has something to gain from it: a favour, a reciprocal act of solidarity, or access to the addressee's/referent's in-group. Secondly, writers use friend in emotional contexts, for example when expressing intimacy and affect towards the referent. The material also includes other functions for the term, such as in expressions of goodwill or in news reporting. In general, shifting between in-group/out-group membership appears to be a common function for the use of friend. Over time, the term is increasingly used to indicate intimate friends and acquaintances, whereas reference to members of the family and kin as "friends" declines from the latter half of the seventeenth century onwards.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 103
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, REGULARITY SEMANTIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Elements of discourse understanding
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Advances in Psychology, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115, 10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5, DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1977, FAMILY SEX MARRIAGE
[5]   LANGUAGE STYLE AS AUDIENCE DESIGN [J].
BELL, A .
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 1984, 13 (02) :145-204
[6]   Who is this ''we''? Levels of collective identity and self representations [J].
Brewer, MB ;
Gardner, W .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (01) :83-93
[7]  
COUPLAND N, 1988, LANGUAGE COMMUNICATI, V8
[8]  
Ervin-Tripp S., 1972, SOCILINGUISTICS, P225
[9]  
Evans G., 1982, The Varieties of Reference
[10]  
Giles H., 1979, LANGUAGE SOCIAL PSYC, P45