Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations

被引:1170
作者
Husted, JA
Cook, RJ
Farewell, VT
Gladman, DD
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Hlth Studies & Gerontol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Ctr Prognosis Studies Rheumat Dis, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
clinical trials; outcome measures; responsiveness; responsiveness statistics;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsiveness. We define the first as "internal responsiveness," which characterizes the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and the second as "external responsiveness," which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to corresponding change in a reference measure of clinical or health status. The properties and interpretation of commonly used internal and external responsiveness statistics are examined. It is from the interpretation point of view that external responsiveness statistics are considered particularly attractive. The usefulness of regression models for assessing external responsiveness is also highlighted. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条