Coping With Fear Through Suppression and Avoidance of Threatening Information

被引:31
作者
Nielsen, Jesper [1 ]
Shapiro, Stewart [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Mkt, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Business Adm, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
fear appeal; suppression; attention avoidance; PROTECTION-MOTIVATION THEORY; PARALLEL PROCESS MODEL; SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; LEXICAL-DECISION TASK; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; ATTITUDE-CHANGE; THOUGHT SUPPRESSION; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; ALCOHOL-USE; APPEALS;
D O I
10.1037/a0017018
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Fear appeal communications are widely used by social marketers in their efforts to persuade individuals to refrain from engaging in risky behaviors. The present research shows that exposure to a fear appeal can lead to the suppression of concepts semantically related to the threat and bias attentional resources away from threat-relevant information. Participants in the experimental condition viewed a fear appeal advertisement depicting the negative consequences of drinking and driving. The results of a reaction time task showed inhibited responses to words semantically related to drinking (e.g., beer, party) relative to a baseline group that controlled for priming effects (Experiment la) and level of fear (Experiment 1b). Furthermore, those in the experimental condition were shown to adopt an attention avoidance processing style, decreasing attention to alcohol-related advertisements appearing in a mock magazine (Experiments 2a and 2b). Because processing of alcohol-related advertising has been linked previously to an increase in drinking and driving, inhibited processing of such advertisements suggests a positive outcome of suppression effects. This contrasts with prior claims suggesting that suppression is counter to prevention-based efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 274
页数:17
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   THE ROLE OF ALCOHOL ADVERTISING IN EXCESSIVE AND HAZARDOUS DRINKING [J].
ATKIN, CK ;
NEUENDORF, K ;
MCDERMOTT, S .
JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION, 1983, 13 (04) :313-325
[2]  
Barnes-Holmes Y., 2004, INT J PSYCHOL PSYCHO, V4, P531
[3]   NEGATIVE EMOTION AND MESSAGE PROCESSING [J].
BARON, R ;
LOGAN, H ;
LILLY, J ;
INMAN, M ;
BRENNAN, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 30 (02) :181-201
[4]   THE EFFECT OF ADVERTISING ON ATTITUDE ACCESSIBILITY, ATTITUDE CONFIDENCE, AND THE ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR RELATIONSHIP [J].
BERGER, IE ;
MITCHELL, AA .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (03) :269-279
[5]   NOVELTY, COMPLEXITY, AND HEDONIC VALUE [J].
BERLYNE, DE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1970, 8 (5A) :279-&
[6]   Guarding against threatening HIV prevention messages: An information-processing model [J].
Blumberg, SJ .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (06) :780-795
[7]   Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Mogg, K ;
Falla, SJ ;
Hamilton, LR .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (06) :737-753
[8]  
Brown JH, 1997, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V19, P65
[9]   The timeline of threat processing in repressors: more evidence for early vigilance and late avoidance [J].
Caldwell, TL ;
Newman, LS .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (08) :1957-1967
[10]   DEPTH OF PROCESSING AND RETENTION OF WORDS IN EPISODIC MEMORY [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
TULVING, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1975, 104 (03) :268-294