Building-integrated renewable energy policy analysis in China

被引:0
作者
Yao Chun-nia [1 ]
Hao Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Energy Efficiency Bldg, Minist Construct, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY | 2009年 / 16卷
关键词
Building-integrated Renewable Energy Policy; cost-benefit analysis; demonstration projects;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-009-0210-4
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
With the dramatic development of renewable energy all over the world, and for purpose of adjusting energy structure, the Ministry of Construction of China plans to promote the large scale application of renewable energy in buildings. In order to ensure the validity of policy-making, this work firstly exerts a method to do cost-benefit analysis for three kinds of technologies such as building-integrated solar hot water (BISHW) system, building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) technology and ground water heat pump (GWHP). Through selecting a representative city of every climate region, the analysis comes into different results for different climate regions in China and respectively different suggestion for policy-making. On the analysis basis, the Ministry of Construction (MOC) and the Ministry of Finance of China (MOF) united to start-up Building-integrated Renewable Energy Demonstration Projects (BIREDP) in 2006. In the demonstration projects, renewable energy takes place of traditional energy to supply the domestic hot water, electricity, air-conditioning and heating. Through carrying out the demonstration projects, renewable energy related market has been expanded. More and more relative companies and local governments take the opportunity to promote the large scale application of renewable energy in buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 213
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Feasibility analysis of introducing renewable energy systems in environmental basic facilities: A case study in Busan, South Korea
    Kim, Jiwon
    Choi, Hyunho
    Kim, Samuel
    Yu, Jaecheul
    ENERGY, 2018, 150 : 702 - 708
  • [22] The Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Electricity Production from Small Scale Renewable Energy Sources in the Conditions of Romania
    Atanasoae, Pavel
    Pentiuc, Radu Dumitru
    Milici, Dan Laurentiu
    Olariu, Elena Daniela
    Poienar, Michaela
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING (INTER-ENG 2018), 2019, 32 : 385 - 389
  • [23] Cost-benefit analysis of integrated energy system planning considering demand response
    Xiang, Yue
    Cai, Hanhu
    Gu, Chenghong
    Shen, Xiaodong
    ENERGY, 2020, 192
  • [24] Cost-benefit analysis of photovoltaic-storage investment in integrated energy systems
    Guo, Yongtao
    Xiang, Yue
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 66 - 71
  • [25] Nearly-Zero Energy Buildings: Cost-Optimal Analysis of Building Envelope Characteristics
    Loukaidou, K.
    Michopoulos, A.
    Zachariadis, Th.
    SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 20 - 27
  • [26] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China
    Hao, Aibo
    Yin, Changbin
    Leonard, Angelique
    Dogot, Thomas
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [27] A comprehensive analysis on definitions, development, and policies of nearly zero energy buildings in China
    Liu, Zhijian
    Zhou, Qingxu
    Tian, Zhiyong
    He, Bao-jie
    Jin, Guangya
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 114
  • [28] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building
    Conti, Paolo
    Schito, Eva
    Testi, Daniele
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (08)
  • [29] Improving air pollution control policy in China-A perspective based on cost-benefit analysis
    Gao, Jinglei
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Liu, Xuewei
    Xia, Xiaoming
    Huang, Xianjin
    Dong, Zhanfeng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 543 : 307 - 314
  • [30] Cost-benefit analysis for Energy Efficiency Retrofit of existing buildings: A case study in China
    Liu, Yuming
    Liu, Tingting
    Ye, Sudong
    Liu, Yisheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 493 - 506