Strategic planning and performance measurement: engaging the community to develop performance metrics

被引:5
作者
Eckerd, Adam [1 ]
Bulka, Lauren [2 ]
Nahapetian, Eta
Castellow, Dale
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Arlington, TX USA
关键词
Performance management; economic development; performance measurement; local government; community engagement; PUBLIC-SECTOR; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; LEGITIMACY; ACCOUNTABILITY; ADOPTION; STATE; NEGOTIATION; PROGRESS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/19460171.2019.1660904
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Fairfax County, Virginia is the Commonwealth's largest county, and one of the largest and wealthiest local jurisdictions in the United States. Its economy is large and diverse, as is its population, so measuring the success of the economy extends beyond traditional measures of economic development. In this paper, we describe a multi-year effort to conceive of performance management from a strategic planning perspective and develop a set of metrics that move beyond the traditional instrumentally focused metrics and views performance management as a governance process that builds relationships between stakeholders and fosters mutual learning. The metrics that emerged from this process were developed by engaging the public early and working with key county stakeholders to arrive at a set of metrics that encompassed not just county leaders' views of what makes a county economy work, but those of citizens, businesses, schools, nonprofits and other members of the public as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement [J].
Adcroft, Andy ;
Willis, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) :386-+
[2]  
Alonso William, 1987, The Politics of Numbers
[3]   Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project [J].
Ammons, David N. ;
Rivenbark, William C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2008, 68 (02) :304-318
[4]   SIGNS OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT PROGRESS AMONG PROMINENT CITY GOVERNMENTS [J].
Ammons, David N. .
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 36 (04) :507-528
[5]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[6]  
Behn R.D., 2014, The PerformanceStat potential: A leadership strategy for producing results
[7]   INNOVATION OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT - THE ADOPTION OF STRATEGIC-PLANNING [J].
BERRY, FS .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1994, 54 (04) :322-330
[8]  
Biesta G., 2015, GOOD ED AGE MEASUREM, DOI 10.1007s11092-008-9064-9
[9]  
Bouckaert G., 2002, Public Performance Management Review, V25, P359, DOI DOI 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643672
[10]  
Boyne G.A., 2006, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO