CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes affect benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in smokers' lung:: comparison with aromatic/hydrophobic adduct formation

被引:141
作者
Alexandrov, K
Cascorbi, I
Rojas, M
Bouvier, G
Kriek, E
Bartsch, H
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Toxicol & Canc Risk Factors, D-69009 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Greifswald, Fac Med, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/carcin/23.12.1969
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts are involved in the induction of p53 mutations and probably in the causation of human lung cancer associated with cigarette smoking. The ratio between CYP1A1 and GST enzyme activities is a critical determinant of the target dose of carcinogenic BPDE and other DNA-reactive PAH metabolites. In this review, we summarize the published data on modulation of (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels in smokers' lungs by CYP1A1*2 genotypes alone or in combination with GSTM1 polymorphism and compare these results with those reported for aromatic/hydrophobic (bulky) DNA adducts. The data published so far show only a trend for a non-significant increase in bulky DNA adduct levels in subjects with GSTM1*0 or the CYP1A1*2-GSTM1*0 genotype combination. In contrast, a clear dependence of (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels was found as a function of the CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes: In lung parenchyma, this adduct was more pronounced in persons with the GSTM1*0 genotype, and CYP1A1*2-GSTM1*0 carriers had higher (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels than those with CYP1A1*1/*1-GSTM1*0. The homozygous CYP1A1*2/*2 carriers in the GSTM1*0 group had the highest (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels. Our analysis leads to the conclusion that the risk-modifying effects of metabolic genotypes and of gene interactions might be more easily identifiable if specific markers of structurally defined adducts were used, such as the (+)-anti-BPDE-DNA adduct. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that BP (PAH) induce G:c to T:A transversion mutations in the hotspot codons of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and are thus involved in malignant transformation of the lung tissue of smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:1969 / 1977
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] ALEXANDROV K, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P6248
  • [2] Andreassen A, 1996, MUTAT RES-GENET TOX, V368, P275
  • [3] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF PULMONARY CYTOCHROME P450IA AND METABOLIC-ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH P450IA1 AND P450IA2 ISOZYMES IN LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS
    ANTTILA, S
    VAINIO, H
    HIETANEN, E
    CAMUS, AM
    MALAVEILLE, C
    BRUN, G
    HUSGAFVELPURSIAINEN, K
    HEIKKILA, L
    KARJALAINEN, A
    BARTSCH, H
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1992, 98 : 179 - 182
  • [4] SMOKING AND PERIPHERAL TYPE OF CANCER ARE RELATED TO HIGH-LEVELS OF PULMONARY CYTOCHROME-P450IA IN LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS
    ANTTILA, S
    HIETANEN, E
    VAINIO, H
    CAMUS, AM
    GELBOIN, HV
    PARK, SS
    HEIKKILA, L
    KARJALAINEN, A
    BARTSCH, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 47 (05) : 681 - 685
  • [5] An uncommon phenotype of poor inducibility of CYP1A1 in human lung is not ascribable to polymorphisms in the AHR, ARNT, or CYP1A1 genes
    Anttila, S
    Lei, XD
    Elovaara, E
    Karjalainen, A
    Sun, WM
    Vainio, H
    Hankinson, O
    [J]. PHARMACOGENETICS, 2000, 10 (08): : 741 - 751
  • [6] ANTTILA S, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P5643
  • [7] Genetic polymorphisms in human xenobiotica metabolizing enzymes as susceptibility factors in toxic response
    Autrup, H
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2000, 464 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [8] DNA adducts in human carcinogenesis: Etiological relevance and structure-activity relationship
    Bartsch, H
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 340 (2-3): : 67 - 79
  • [9] Bartsch H, 2000, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V9, P3
  • [10] EXPRESSION OF PULMONARY CYTOCHROME P4501A1 AND CARCINOGEN DNA ADDUCT FORMATION IN HIGH-RISK SUBJECTS FOR TOBACCO-RELATED LUNG-CANCER
    BARTSCH, H
    CASTEGNARO, M
    ROJAS, M
    CAMUS, AM
    ALEXANDROV, K
    LANG, M
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1992, 64-5 : 477 - 483