Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics

被引:13
|
作者
Castilla, J. A. [1 ]
Hernandez, E. [2 ]
Cabello, Y. [3 ]
Navarro, J. L. [2 ]
Hernandez, J. [4 ]
Gomez, J. L. [5 ]
Pajuelo, N. [6 ]
Marqueta, J. [7 ]
Coroleu, B. [8 ]
机构
[1] HU Virgen de las Nieves, Unidad Reprod, Granada, Spain
[2] HU Virgen de las Nieves, Subdirecc Control Gest, Granada, Spain
[3] FIV Recoletos, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp San Pedro, Serv Ginecol & Obstet, Logrono, Spain
[5] FIV Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[6] Dynam Solut, Madrid, Spain
[7] Inst Balear Infertilidad, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[8] Inst Univ Dexeus, Dept Obstet Ginecol & Reprod, Ser Med Reprod, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
assisted reproduction techniques; coverage; register data; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MULTIPLE GESTATION; PREGNANCY; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES; EUROPE; RISK; IVF; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the type of service provided by assisted reproduction clinics. The activities, treatment patterns and results achieved by assisted reproduction centres in Spain were examined, comparing public and private clinics. A retrospective study was carried out using the Assisted Reproductive Technology Register of the Spanish Fertility Society for 2002-2004. The results showed that 74%, 96% and 99% of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, respectively, were carried Out in the private sector. Public clinics performed proportionally more transfers of three embryos than the private clinics (48.1% versus 41.7%). More elective transfers were performed in private clinics. Pregnancy rates per cycle started, per puncture and per transfer were significantly higher among private than public clinics (29.1%, 32.7% and 35.9% versus 25.2%, 28.5% and 32.6%, respectively) (P<0.05). Implantation rate has risen year oil year in both types of clinic and was significantly higher (P < 0.05), every year, among the private clinics. The multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher among the private clinics (30.8% versus 26.4%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, differences exist between public and private clinics as regards to their Volume Of activity, the range of services offered, clinical practice and results achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 878
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies
    Deonandan, R.
    CHRONIC DISEASES IN CANADA, 2010, 30 (04) : 119 - 124
  • [2] Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): Evaluation of evidence to support public policy development
    Nardelli, Alexa A.
    Stafinski, Tania
    Motan, Tarek
    Klein, Kristin
    Menon, Devidas
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 11
  • [3] Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association
    Barnhart, Kurt T.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (02) : 299 - 302
  • [4] International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2013
    Banker, Manish
    Dyer, Silke
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    Ishihara, Osamu
    Kupka, Markus
    de Mouzon, Jacques
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Adamson, G. David
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : 741 - 756
  • [5] Birth defects and assisted reproductive technologies
    Simpson, Joe Leigh
    SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 19 (03): : 177 - 182
  • [6] Assisted reproductive technologies for women with rheumatic AID
    Lockshin, Michael D.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 64 : 85 - 96
  • [7] Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Balayla, Jacques
    Sheehy, Odile
    Fraser, William D.
    Seguin, Jean R.
    Trasler, Jacquetta
    Monnier, Patricia
    MacLeod, Andrea A.
    Simard, Marie-Noelle
    Muckle, Gina
    Berard, Anick
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (02): : 265 - 272
  • [8] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and placental abnormalities
    Cochrane, Elizabeth
    Pando, Christine
    Kirschen, Gregory W.
    Soucier, Devon
    Fuchs, Anna
    Garry, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (08) : 825 - 828
  • [9] Assisted reproductive technologies and thrombosis
    Grandone, Elvira
    Villani, Michela
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2015, 135 : S44 - S45
  • [10] Evolution of assisted reproductive technologies
    Jouannet, Pierre
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2009, 193 (03): : 573 - 582