Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll

被引:31
作者
Murtinho, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Hayes, Tanya [3 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Int Studies, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[2] Seattle Univ, Inst Publ Serv, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[3] Seattle Univ, Inst Publ Serv & Environm Studies, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Collective action; Conservation; Common-pool resource; Ecosystem services; Latin America; Paramo; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; EQUITY; FOREST; CONSERVATION; LEGITIMACY; LESSONS; POVERTY; FUTURE; CARBON; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-017-0838-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payment for Environmental Service programs are increasingly applied in communal settings where resource users collectively join the program and agree to limit their shared use of a common-property resource. Who decides to join PES and the degree to which community members agree with the collective decision is critical for the success of said programs. Yet, we have limited understanding of the factors that influence communal participation and the collective decision process. This paper examines communal participation in a national payment for conservation program in Ecuador. We use quantitative and qualitative analysis to (i) identify the attributes of the communities that participate (or not), and factors that facilitate participation (n = 67), and (ii) assess household preference and alignment with the collective decision to participate (n = 212). Household participation preferences indicate varying degrees of consensus with the collective decision to participate, with those using the resource less likely to support participation. At the communal level, however, our results indicate that over time, those communities that depend more heavily on their resource systems may ultimately choose to participate. Our findings suggest that communal governance structures and outside organizations may be instrumental in gaining participation in resource-dependent communities and building consensus. Findings also point to the need for further research on communal decision-processes to ensure that the collective decision is based on an informed and democratic process.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 955
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Understanding the Social and Ecological Outcomes of PES Projects: A Review and an Analysis [J].
Adhikari, Bhim ;
Agrawal, Arun .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2013, 11 (04) :359-374
[2]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[3]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[4]  
[Anonymous], INSTRUMENTS SUSTAINA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems building resilience for complexity and change
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT J EPIDEMIOLOGY
[7]  
[Anonymous], AC MIN NUM 115
[8]  
[Anonymous], B INF
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COMUNIDADES INDIGENA
[10]  
[Anonymous], TERRITORIOS PARAMO T