Comparing transport emissions and impacts for energy recovery from domestic waste (EfW): Centralised and distributed disposal options for two UK Counties

被引:17
作者
Bastin, Lucy [1 ]
Longden, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
EfW; GIS; Routing; Dijkstra; Transport; MCA; MCDA; ELECTRICITY; POLICY; SCALE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.05.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Many local authorities (LAs) are currently working to reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and the amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) sent to landfill. The recovery of energy from waste (EfW) can assist in meeting both of these objectives. The choice of an EfW policy combines spatial and non-spatial decisions which may be handled using multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and geographic information systems (GIS). This paper addresses the impact of transporting MSW to EfW facilities, analysed as part of a larger decision support system designed to make an overall policy assessment of centralised (large-scale) and distributed (local-scale) approaches. Custom-written ArcMap extensions are used to compare centralised versus distributed approaches, using shortest-path routing based on expected road speed. Results are intersected with 1-km grids and census geographies for meaningful maps of cumulative impact. Case studies are described for two counties in the United Kingdom (UK); Cornwall and Warwickshire. For both case study areas, centralised scenarios generate more traffic, fuel costs and emitted carbon per tonne of MSW processed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 503
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE RE
[3]  
Beggs C., 2002, ENERGY MANAGEMENT SU
[4]  
*BIFF, 2002, FUT PERF, P66
[5]  
BROWN R, 2003, COMMUNICATION
[6]  
CRAIG R, 1995, P EPRI C NEW POW GEN
[7]   Resource mapping and analysis of farm livestock manures - assessing the opportunities for biomass-to-energy schemes [J].
Dagnall, S ;
Hill, J ;
Pegg, D .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 71 (03) :225-234
[8]  
De Smith MJ., 2007, GEOSPATIAL ANAL COMP
[9]  
Department of Trade and Industry, 2003, OUR EN FUT CREAT LOW
[10]  
*DFT, 2005, TRANSP STAT GREAT BR