Tutoring Environment for Automata and the Users' Achievement Goal Orientations

被引:0
作者
Tecson, Cesar A. [1 ,2 ]
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ateneo Manila Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Comp Sci, Quezon City, Philippines
[2] Cor Jesu Coll, Coll Engn & Technol, Digos City, Davao Del Sur, Philippines
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (TALE) | 2018年
关键词
automata simulator; intelligent tutoring system; achievement goal orientation; system usability; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Studying automata theory exposes the students to the theoretical foundation of Computer Science where they learn abstraction, generalization, and reasoning. However, teaching and learning automata is challenging because of the involved abstract notions and mathematical background. Many students experience difficulty in understanding the computability concepts. Hence, recent advances in teaching the course focus on the development of different pedagogical tools that can be used to facilitate the learning of automata theory and formal languages. Another factor that mediates student achievement is achievement goal orientation. Some students are mastery-oriented and some others are performance-oriented. Both types of learners have different learning needs. This study presents the appeal of the developed tutoring system for automata, ILSA, to the different achievement goal orientations of learners.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 533
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
AbuEloun N.N, 2017, J ADV SCI RES, V2, P11
[2]  
Andarab M., 2013, J ED PRACTICE, V4
[3]  
Armoni M., 2004, AUTOMATA THEORY ITS
[4]   MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR [J].
ATKINSON, JW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1957, 64 (06) :359-372
[5]  
AUH MS, 2014, ACM INROADS, V5, P32
[6]  
Chakraborty Pinaki, 2011, ACM Inroads, V2, P59, DOI 10.1145/2038876.2038893
[7]  
Chesnevar C. I., 2003, SIGCSE Bulletin, V35, P33, DOI 10.1145/782941.782975
[8]  
Chuda D., 2007, P 2007 INT C COMP SY, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/1330598.1330687
[9]  
Denning P., 1980, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V43, P630
[10]  
Devedzic V., 2000, ED TECHNOLOGY SOC, V3, P2