Development of a cancer pain prognostic scale

被引:34
作者
Hwang, SS
Chang, VT
Fairclough, DL
Kasimis, B
机构
[1] VA New Jersey Hlth Care Syst E Orange, Hematol Oncol Sect, E Orange, NJ 07018 USA
[2] VA New Jersey Hlth Care Syst E Orange, Patient Care Serv, E Orange, NJ 07018 USA
[3] UMDNJ, Sch Nursing, Newark, NJ USA
[4] UMDNJ, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ USA
[5] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Ctr Res Methodol & Biometry, Denver, CO USA
关键词
cancer; pain; prognosis; veterans; pain relief; predictive rule; MSAS-SF; FACT-G; Brief Pain Inventory;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00488-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop a Cancer Pain Prognostic Scale (CPPS) which could predict the likelihood of pain relief within 2 weeks for cancer patients with moderate to severe pain. Seventy-four (74) consecutive patients who presented with cancer-related pain were, managed in accordance with the guidelines for pain management developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Patients were followed weekly using the Brief-Pain Inventory (BPI), and medications were recorded weekly for 3 weeks. Baseline scores from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G), Mental Health Inventory (MHI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) at initial interview served as explanatory variables in a logistic regression model. Pain relief greater than or equal to 80% at the end of weeks 1 and 2 were used as outcomes in this model. From this analysis, we developed a predictive formula, the CPPS, which includes the worst pain severity, FACT-G emotional well being, daily opioid dose, and pain characteristics. The rule yields a numerical score that ranges from 0-17. Higher scores correspond to a higher probability of good pain relief. The CPPS has the potential to rapidly identify patients with Poor pain prognosis. It can be used as a research tool to characterize pain in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 378
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL NATURE OF CANCER-RELATED PAIN [J].
AHLES, TA ;
BLANCHARD, EB ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (03) :277-288
[2]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD TXB PALLITATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[4]  
AVIES AR, 1988, N2190HHS RAND
[5]   TREATMENT OUTCOME IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANCER PAIN CLINIC [J].
BANNING, A ;
SJOGREN, P ;
HENRIKSEN, H .
PAIN, 1991, 47 (02) :129-134
[6]   Test characteristics and decision rules [J].
Barry, HC ;
Ebell, MH .
ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 26 (01) :45-+
[7]   A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER ASSESSMENT OF THE EDMONTON STAGING SYSTEM FOR CANCER PAIN [J].
BRUERA, E ;
SCHOELLER, T ;
WENK, R ;
MACEACHERN, T ;
MARCELINO, S ;
HANSON, J ;
SUAREZALMAZOR, M .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (05) :348-355
[8]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[9]  
Chang VT, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1162, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Y