Computer-aided detection in mammography: An assessment of performance on current and prior images

被引:27
作者
Zheng, B
Shah, R
Wallace, L
Hakim, C
Ganott, MA
Gur, D
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
breast; calcification; breast neoplasms; diagnosis; breast radiography; computers; diagnostic aid;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80557-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors assessed and compared the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme for the detection of masses and microcalcification clusters on a set of images collected from two consecutive ("current" and "prior") mammographic examinations. Materials and Methods. A previously developed CAD scheme was used to assess two consecutive screening mammograms from 200 cases in which the current mammogram showed a mass or cluster of microcalcifications that resulted in breast biopsy. The latest prior examinations had been initially interpreted as negative or definitely benign findings (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System rating, 1 or 2). The study involved images of 400 examinations acquired in 200 patients. Radiologists identified 172 masses and 128 clusters of microcalcifications on the current images. The performance of the CAD scheme was analyzed and compared for the current and latest prior images. Results. There were significant differences (P < .01) between current and prior images in many feature values. The performance of the CAD scheme was significantly lower for prior than for current images (P < .01). At 0.5 and 0.2 false-positive mass and cluster cues per image, the scheme detected 78 malignant masses (78%) and 63 malignant clusters (80%) on current images. Only 42% of malignant cases were detected on prior images, including 40 masses (40%) and 36 microcalcification clusters (46%). Conclusion. CAD schemes can detect a substantial fraction of masses and microcalcification clusters depicted on prior images. To improve performance with prior images, the scheme may have to be adaptively reoptimized with increasingly more subtle abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1250
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Effect of human variability on independent double: Reading in screening mammography
    Beam, CA
    Sullivan, DC
    Layde, PM
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (11) : 891 - 897
  • [2] ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    BIRD, RE
    WALLACE, TW
    YANKASKAS, BC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) : 613 - 617
  • [3] Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection
    Birdwell, RL
    Ikeda, DM
    O'Shaughnessy, KF
    Sickles, EA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) : 192 - 202
  • [4] BRAKE GM, 1998, RADIOLOGY, V207, P465
  • [5] Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
  • [6] American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening
    Feig, SA
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Jackson, VP
    Kopans, DB
    Monsees, B
    Sickles, EA
    Stelling, CB
    Zinninger, M
    Wilcox-Buchalla, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [7] Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
    Freer, TW
    Ulissey, MJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) : 781 - 786
  • [8] Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses
    Hadjiiski, L
    Sahiner, B
    Chan, HP
    Petrick, N
    Helvie, MA
    Gurcan, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (11) : 2309 - 2317
  • [9] Proposition: All mammograms should be double-read
    Hendee, WR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) : 115 - 115
  • [10] Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations
    Lewin, JM
    Hendrick, RE
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Moss, LJ
    Karellas, A
    Sisney, GA
    Kuni, CC
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 873 - 880