Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching

被引:23
作者
Boring, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Philippe, Arnaud [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LIEPP Sci Po, Paris, France
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Student evaluations of teaching; Gender biases; Field experiment; MARKET IMPACT; LABOR-MARKET; LAWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104323
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a field experiment designed to reduce gender discrimination in student evaluations of teaching (SET). In the first intervention, students receive a normative statement reminding them that they should not discriminate in SETs. In the second intervention, the normative statement includes precise information about how other students (especially male students) have discriminated against female teachers in previous years. The purely normative statement has no significant impact on SET overall satisfaction scores, suggesting that a blanket awareness-raising campaign may be inefficient to reduce discrimination. However, the informational statement appears to significantly reduce gender discrimination. The effect we find mainly comes from a change in male students' evaluation of female teachers. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Alesina A, 2018, W25333 NAT BUR EC RE
[2]   The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Rogers, Todd .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (10) :3003-3037
[3]   Students' perceptions of expressiveness: Age and gender effects on teacher evaluations [J].
Arbuckle, J ;
Williams, BD .
SEX ROLES, 2003, 49 (9-10) :507-516
[4]   How effective are policies to reduce gasoline consumption? Evaluating a set of measures in Spain [J].
Asensio, Javier ;
Gomez-Lobo, Andres ;
Matas, Anna .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 :34-42
[5]   Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? [J].
Bagues, Manuel ;
Sylos-Labini, Mauro ;
Zinovyeva, Natalia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (04) :1207-1238
[6]   Implicit discrimination [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Chugh, D ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (02) :94-98
[7]  
Bertrand M, 2017, Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, V1, P309, DOI DOI 10.1016/BS.HEFE.2016.08.004
[8]   When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint vs. Separate Evaluation [J].
Bohnet, Iris ;
van Geen, Alexandra ;
Bazerman, Max .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (05) :1225-1234
[9]  
Boring A., 2016, SCIENCEOPEN RES, P1, DOI DOI 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.V1
[10]  
Boring A., 2015, 13 OFCE