The social responsibility of professional societies

被引:2
作者
Hull, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
moral praise and blame; individuals; professional societies; human rights;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9973.00248
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
A consistent position for professional societies with respect to social and moral issues is difficult to forge. The most consistent position is that professional societies qua professional societies should avoid getting involved in any and all social or moral issues. Professional societies should be praised or blamed only on the basis of their success or failure to achieve their professional goals. If, however, we do think that professional societies deserve moral praise and blame with respect to broader moral issues, then the situation gets much more complicated. One contrast explored in this article is between scientific and philosophical societies getting involved in social and moral issues. A second contrast is between individual and group responsibility. If groups are to be praised or blamed, smaller well-integrated groups are the most likely candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 565
页数:14
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Max Planck Society admits to its predecessor's Nazi links [J].
Abbott, A .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6839) :726-726
[2]   Biologists crusade for evolution [J].
Dalton, R .
NATURE, 2001, 409 (6817) :125-125
[3]  
HEILBRON JL, 1996, DILEMMAS UPRIGHT MAN
[4]   REDUCTION IN GENETICS - BIOLOGY OR PHILOSOPHY [J].
HULL, DL .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1972, 39 (04) :491-499
[5]  
Keller L., 1999, Levels of selection in evolution
[6]   1953 AND ALL THAT, A TALE OF 2 SCIENCES [J].
KITCHER, P .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1984, 93 (03) :335-373
[7]   Science and homosexualities. [J].
Li, A .
ISIS, 1998, 89 (04) :711-712
[8]  
MEDAWAR L, 2000, HITLERS GIFT SCIENTI
[9]  
Rosario V., 1997, SCI HOMOSEXUALITIES
[10]  
SISTARE C, 2001, GROUPS GROUPS RIGHTS