Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review

被引:777
作者
Moynihan, Ray [1 ]
Sanders, Sharon [1 ]
Michaleff, Zoe A. [1 ]
Scott, Anna Mae [1 ]
Clark, Justin [1 ]
To, Emma J. [2 ]
Jones, Mark [1 ]
Kitchener, Eliza [3 ]
Fox, Melissa [4 ]
Johansson, Minna [5 ]
Lang, Eddy [2 ]
Duggan, Anne [6 ]
Scott, Ian [7 ]
Albarqouni, Loai [1 ]
机构
[1] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Griffith Univ, Fac Med Dent & Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Hlth Consumers Queensland, Adelaide, Qld, Australia
[5] Cochrane Sustainable Healthcare Field, Lund, Sweden
[6] Australian Commiss Safety & Qual Healthcare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Princess Alexander Hosp, Internal Med & Clin Epidemiol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
quality in health care; organisation of health services; epidemiology; public health; health policy;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the extent and nature of changes in utilisation of healthcare services during COVID-19 pandemic. Design Systematic review. Eligibility Eligible studies compared utilisation of services during COVID-19 pandemic to at least one comparable period in prior years. Services included visits, admissions, diagnostics and therapeutics. Studies were excluded if from single centres or studied only patients with COVID-19. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and preprints were searched, without language restrictions, until 10 August, using detailed searches with key concepts including COVID-19, health services and impact. Data analysis Risk of bias was assessed by adapting the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, and a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care tool. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics, graphical figures and narrative synthesis. Outcome measures Primary outcome was change in service utilisation between prepandemic and pandemic periods. Secondary outcome was the change in proportions of users of healthcare services with milder or more severe illness (eg, triage scores). Results 3097 unique references were identified, and 81 studies across 20 countries included, reporting on >11 million services prepandemic and 6.9 million during pandemic. For the primary outcome, there were 143 estimates of changes, with a median 37% reduction in services overall (IQR -51% to -20%), comprising median reductions for visits of 42% (-53% to -32%), admissions 28% (-40% to -17%), diagnostics 31% (-53% to -24%) and for therapeutics 30% (-57% to -19%). Among 35 studies reporting secondary outcomes, there were 60 estimates, with 27 (45%) reporting larger reductions in utilisation among people with a milder spectrum of illness, and 33 (55%) reporting no difference. Conclusions Healthcare utilisation decreased by about a third during the pandemic, with considerable variation, and with greater reductions among people with less severe illness. While addressing unmet need remains a priority, studies of health impacts of reductions may help health systems reduce unnecessary care in the postpandemic recovery. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020203729.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Armchair Medical TV, 2019, LAR GOLL OFF WEL PRE
  • [2] COVID-19: A Window of Opportunity for Positive Healthcare Reforms
    Auener, Stefan
    Kroon, Danielle
    Wackers, Erik
    Dulmen, Simone van
    Jeurissen, Patrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 9 (10) : 419 - 422
  • [3] Admissions to Veterans Affairs Hospitals for Emergency Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Baum, Aaron
    Schwartz, Mark D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (01): : 96 - 99
  • [4] PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
    Beller, Elaine M.
    Glasziou, Paul P.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Hopewell, Sally
    Bastian, Hilda
    Chalmers, Iain
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Lasserson, Toby
    Tovey, David
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (04)
  • [5] Eliminating Waste in US Health Care
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Hackbarth, Andrew D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (14): : 1513 - 1516
  • [6] Reducing overuse in healthcare: advancing Choosing Wisely
    Born, Karen
    Kool, Tijn
    Levinson, Wendy
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
  • [7] Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
    Campbell, Mhairi
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Sowden, Amanda
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Ellis, Simon
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Thomas, James
    Welch, Vivian
    Thomson, Hilary
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [8] Canadian Institute for Healthcare Information, 2017, UNN CAR CAN INF
  • [9] The impact of SARS on hospital performance
    Chu, Dachen
    Chen, Ran-Chou
    Ku, Chia-Yu
    Chou, Pesus
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [10] Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), 2017, EPOC Resources for Review Authors