Lipid profile during azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil combinations with cyclosporine and steroids

被引:20
|
作者
Akman, B. [1 ]
Uyar, M. [1 ]
Afsar, B. [1 ]
Sezer, S. [1 ]
Ozdemir, F. N. [1 ]
Haberal, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Dept Nephrol, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.210
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Immunosuppressive therapy is the major cause of hyperlipidemia after renal transplantation. We sought to compare the effects of an azathioprine (AZA) combination (n = 26) with corticosteroid and cyclosporine (CyA; group 1) with a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination (n = 71; group 2) in the first year following renal transplantation. Methods. Ninety-seven renal transplant patients (71 men, 26 women; aged 34.7 +/- 13.1 years; renal transplantation duration, 44.9 +/- 12.9 months) underwent serum lipid profiles-total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL); low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) at the initiation of as well as 3-month intervals after grafting for 1 year retrospectively. Serum creatinine for each patient was recorded at 12 months. We evaluated possible risk factors for hyperlipidemia. Results. For all patients, the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (> 200 mg/dL) was 36.1% during the pretransplant period, 60.8% at month 3, 50.5% at month 6, and 38.1% at month 12 after renal transplantation. Total cholesterol and triglyceride levels significantly increased in both groups in the first year (P =.001 and P =.02, respectively). Three-month values for total cholesterol were higher in group 2 than group 1 (P =.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to total cholesterol and triglyceride levels (P > .05). In both groups, HDL, LDL, and VLDL levels did not change during the 12-month study (P > .05 for all). Conclusions. Independent of hyperlipidemia risk factors, serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels tended to increase during CyA and steroid therapy among patients undergoing renal transplantation. Combination with MMF or AZA showed no advantage over one another regarding their effects on the lipid profile.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 137
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Canadian multicentre trial of tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids versus neoral/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids in renal transplantation
    Busque, S
    Shoker, A
    Landsberg, D
    McAlister, V
    Halloran, P
    Shapiro, J
    Peets, J
    Schulz, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1266 - 1267
  • [2] The impact of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids on wound healing in 513 kidney-transplant recipients
    Flechner, SM
    Zhou, LM
    Derweesh, I
    Mastroianni, B
    Savas, K
    Goldfarb, D
    Modlin, CS
    Krishnamurthi, V
    Novick, A
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (12) : 1729 - 1734
  • [3] Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation
    Pescovitz, MD
    Bumgardner, G
    Gaston, RS
    Kirkman, RL
    Light, S
    Patel, IH
    Nieforth, K
    Vincenti, F
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (06) : 511 - 517
  • [4] Outcome in cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine A and azathioprine
    Lee, CM
    Markezich, AJ
    Scandling, JD
    Dafoe, DC
    Alfrey, EJ
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 76 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [5] Short-term mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporine compared to standard maintenance regimes of cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine in kidney transplantation: Interim analysis
    Sadek, SA
    Vogt, B
    Beauregard-Zollinger, L
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S238 - S238
  • [6] Avoidance of cyclosporine in renal transplantation: Effects of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids
    Tran, HTB
    Acharya, MK
    McKay, DB
    Sayegh, MH
    Carpenter, CB
    Auchincloss, H
    Kirkman, RL
    Milford, EL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2000, 11 (10): : 1903 - 1909
  • [7] Comparative trial of Prograf (tacrolimus) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil vs. neoral (cyclosporine) with mycophenolate mofetil after kidney transplantation
    Gonwa, T
    Ahsan, N
    Halloran, P
    Stegall, M
    Hardy, M
    Metzger, R
    Shield, C
    Rocher, L
    Scandling, J
    Sorense, J
    Mulloy, L
    Light, J
    Corwin, C
    Danovitch, G
    Wachs, M
    Van Veldhuisen, P
    Salm, K
    Tolzman, D
    Fitzsimmons, W
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S239 - S239
  • [8] Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine and azathioprine in heart transplant recipients
    Teebken, OE
    Strüber, M
    Harringer, W
    Pichlmaier, MA
    Haverich, A
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (04) : 1265 - 1268
  • [9] Randomized study on the conversion of treatment with cyclosporine to azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil followed by dose reduction
    Gregoor, PJHS
    van Gelder, T
    van Besouw, NM
    van der Mast, BJ
    Ijzermans, JNM
    Weimar, W
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (01) : 143 - 148
  • [10] A Randomized Trial With Steroids and Antithymocyte Globulins Comparing Cyclosporine/Azathioprine Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil (CATM2) in Renal Transplantation
    Vacher-Coponat, Henri
    Moal, Valerie
    Indreies, Monica
    Purgus, Raj
    Loundou, Anderson
    Burtey, Stephane
    Brunet, Philippe
    Moussi-Frances, Julie
    Daniel, Laurent
    Dussol, Bertrand
    Berland, Yvon
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 93 (04) : 437 - 443