Does chemotherapy have a role as palliative therapy for unfit or elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

被引:0
作者
Gridelli, C [1 ]
机构
[1] SG Moscati Hosp, Div Med Oncol, I-83100 Avellino, Italy
关键词
gemcitabine; vinorelbine; combination chemotherapy; single-agent therapy; paclitaxel; docetaxel; cisplatin; carboplatin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Elderly patients and younger "unfit" patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2) suffering from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are two different populations-both of which require palliative treatments. Elderly patients frequently experience progressive decline of organ function and multiple comorbidities, which need to be considered when choosing therapy. ECOG 1594 showed that advanced NSCLC patients with an ECOG PS of 2 did not tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel, cisplatin/docetaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel). These data confirm that treatments designed specifically for this patient subset are needed. Single-agent chemotherapy seems to be a reasonable approach, and non-platinum-based combination chemotherapy should also be investigated. The oncology community has become increasingly aware of the magnitude of the problem of cancer in the elderly. More than 30% of lung cancers arise in patients 70 years old. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly, according to the few published papers, and are not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy in clinical practice. A phase III randomized trial (ELVIS [Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study]) demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits with single-agent vinorelbine versus best supportive care. Among the newer drugs, gemcitabine has demonstrated activity and low toxicity in phase II studies. With this background, we performed a randomized, multicenter phase III trial (MILES [Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study]) in 707 advanced NSCLC elderly patients. The MILES study compared single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine versus polychemotherapy with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine. Results showed no benefit in response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life for the combination. Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard treatment approach for elderly NSCLC patients with advanced disease. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S45 / S50
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
  • [2] Altavilla G, 2000, ANTICANCER RES, V20, P3675
  • [3] Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer - a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
    Anderson, H.
    Hopwood, P.
    Stephens, R. J.
    Thatcher, N.
    Cottier, B.
    Nicholson, M.
    Milroy, R.
    Maughan, T. S.
    Falk, S. J.
    Bond, M. G.
    Burt, P. A.
    Connolly, C. K.
    McIllmurray, M. B.
    Carmichael, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (04) : 447 - 453
  • [4] Balducci L, 2000, Cancer Control, V7, P539
  • [5] Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century
    Balducci, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (14) : 1741 - 1754
  • [6] Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in elderly or unfit patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Beretta, GD
    Michetti, G
    Belometti, MO
    Gritti, G
    Quadri, A
    Poletti, P
    Labianca, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (05) : 573 - 576
  • [7] Age and the treatment of lung cancer
    Brown, JS
    Eraut, D
    Trask, C
    Davison, AG
    [J]. THORAX, 1996, 51 (06) : 564 - 568
  • [8] Buccheri G, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P2677, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2677::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-B
  • [10] WEEKLY VINORELBINE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    COLLEONI, M
    GAION, F
    NELLI, P
    COLMELLERE, GM
    MANENTE, P
    [J]. TUMORI, 1994, 80 (06) : 448 - 452