Improving supply chain social responsibility through supplier development

被引:65
|
作者
Zhang, Min [1 ]
Pawar, Kulwant S. [2 ]
Bhardwaj, Saurabh [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Operat Management, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Ctr Concurrent Enterprise, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Nottingham, England
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; supplier development; pharmaceutical supply chain; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; INITIATIVES; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; TRENDS; CSR;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2017.1309717
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) emphasises that the entire supply chain of a company should protect natural environment and contribute to social well-being in a tangible way. This study aims to clarify the effects of supplier development practices on supply chain social responsibility. The investigation uses a qualitative case study approach and empirically explores how to develop supplier's CSR capabilities in a pharmaceutical supply chain. The results indicate that manufacturers can apply supplier development practices, including standard operating procedures (SOPs), audits, collaboration and training, to develop supply chain social responsibility. SOPs and audits are indirect supplier development practices that are designed in response to institutional pressures, and collaboration and training are direct supplier development practices that provide resources for bridging supplier's CSR capability gaps. In addition, the indirect and direct supplier development practices positively influence each other and they are complementary in enhancing supply chain social responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 511
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving supply chain performance by Supplier Development program through enhanced visibility
    Pradhan, Sudeep Kumar
    Routroy, Srikanta
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (02) : 3629 - 3638
  • [2] Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract
    Hsueh, Che-Fu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 151 : 214 - 222
  • [3] How blockchain technology utilization influences corporate social responsibility through supply chain transparency and the role of supplier risk
    Uvet, Hasan
    Park, Arim
    Dickens, John
    Oh, Jaeyoung
    Hazen, Benjemin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [4] Improving Supply Chain Performance Through Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Problem
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Tsou, Ming-Cheng
    Wang, Chih-Hung
    Nguyen, Viet Tinh
    Phuong, Pham Ngo Thi
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 70 (01): : 1667 - 1681
  • [5] NGOS' INITIATIVES TO ENHANCE SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN: POVERTY ALLEVIATION THROUGH SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
    Rodriguez, Jorge A.
    Thomsen, Cristina Gimenez
    Arenas, Daniel
    Pagell, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (03) : 83 - 108
  • [6] Sourcing from a Self-Reporting Supplier: Strategic Communication of Social Responsibility in a Supply Chain
    Lu, Tao
    Tomlin, Brian
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (02) : 902 - 920
  • [7] Social responsibility and supply chain relationships
    Carter, CR
    Jennings, MM
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2002, 38 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [8] Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility
    Cruz, Jose M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (13) : 3995 - 4010
  • [9] Untangling drivers for supplier environmental and social responsibility: An investigation in Philips Lighting's Chinese supply chain
    Villena, Veronica H.
    Wilhelm, Miriam
    Xiao, Cheng-Yong
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 67 (04) : 476 - 510
  • [10] Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective
    Mani, Venkatesh
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    Delgado, Catarina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 195 : 259 - 272