Feature Relevance Analysis and Classification of Road Traffic Accident Data through Data Mining Techniques

被引:0
作者
Shanthi, S. [1 ]
Ramani, R. Geetha [2 ]
机构
[1] Anna Univ, Dept Informat Sci & Technol, Rathinam Tech Campus, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Anna Univ, Coll Engn, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, WCECS 2012, VOL I | 2012年
关键词
Road Traffic Accidents; Classification; Feature Selection; Meta Classifier; Accuracy Measures; TREE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This research work emphasizes the significance of Data Mining classification algorithms in predicting the factors which influence the road traffic accidents specific to injury severity. It precisely compares the performance of classification algorithms viz. C4.5, CR-T, ID3, CS-CRT, CS-MC4, Na ve Bayes and Random Tree, applied to modelling the injury severity that occurred during road traffic accidents. Further we applied feature selection methods to select the relevant road accident related factors and Meta classifier Arc-X4 to improve the accuracy of the classifiers. Experiment results reveal that the Random Tree based on features selected by Feature Ranking algorithm and Arc-X4 Meta classifier outperformed the individual approaches. The results have been evaluated using the accuracy measures such as Recall and Precision. In this research work we used the road accident training dataset which was obtained from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), provided by the University of Alabama's Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) system.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 127
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Andreas G.K, 2008, JMLR WORKSHOP C P, P90
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, C4. 5: programs for machine learning
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Global status report on road safely: time for action
[4]   USING MUTUAL INFORMATION FOR SELECTING FEATURES IN SUPERVISED NEURAL-NET LEARNING [J].
BATTITI, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (04) :537-550
[5]   An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants [J].
Bauer, E ;
Kohavi, R .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) :105-139
[6]  
Breiman L, 1998, ANN STAT, V26, P801
[7]  
Breiman L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1018054314350
[8]   Comparison of logistic regression model and classification tree: An application to postpartum depression data [J].
Camdeviren, Handan Ankarali ;
Yazici, Ayse Canan ;
Akkus, Zeki ;
Bugdayci, Resul ;
Sungur, Mehmet Ali .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2007, 32 (04) :987-994
[9]   Analysis of traffic injury severity: An application of non-parametric classification tree techniques [J].
Chang, Li-Yen ;
Wang, Hsiu-Wen .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2006, 38 (05) :1019-1027
[10]   Research on collaborative negotiation for e-commerce. [J].
Feng, YQ ;
Lei, Y ;
Li, Y ;
Cao, RZ .
2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :2085-2088