Testing normality: a GMM approach

被引:73
作者
Bontemps, C [1 ]
Meddahi, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, CIREQ, CIRANO, Dept Sci Econ, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Stein equation; Hermite polynomials; parameter uncertainty; HAC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider testing marginal normal distributional assumptions. More precisely, we propose tests based on moment conditions implied by normality. These moment conditions are known as the Stein (Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Vol. 2, pp. 583-602) equations. They coincide with the first class of moment conditions derived by Hansen and Scheinkman (Econometrica 63 (1995) 767) when the random variable of interest is a scalar diffusion. Among other examples, Stein equation implies that the mean of Hermite polynomials is zero. The GMM approach we adopt is well suited for two reasons. It allows us to study in detail the parameter uncertainty problem, i.e., when the tests depend on unknown parameters that have to be estimated. In particular, we characterize the moment conditions that are robust against parameter uncertainty and show that Hermite polynomials are special examples. This is the main contribution of the paper. The second reason for using GMM is that our tests are also valid for time series. In this case, we adopt a heteroskedastic-autocorrelation-consistent approach to estimate the weighting matrix when the dependence of the data is unspecified. We also make a theoretical comparison of our tests with Jarque and Bera (Econom. Lett. 6 (1980) 255) and OPG regression tests of Davidson and MacKinnon (Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford). Finite sample properties of our tests are derived through a comprehensive Monte Carlo study. Finally, two applications to GARCH and realized volatility models are presented. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 186
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Hybrid Hydrological Data-Driven Approach for Daily Streamflow Forecasting [J].
Ghaith, Maysara ;
Siam, Ahmad ;
Li, Zhong ;
El-Dakhakhni, Wael .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2020, 25 (02)
[42]   A new approach to robust modeling of the multi-period portfolio problem [J].
Gharakhani, Mohsen ;
Sadjadi, SeyedJafar .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (23) :9998-10006
[43]   Probabilistic seismic slope stability analysis adopting limiting profile approach [J].
Nandi, Shibsankar ;
Ghosh, Priyanka .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2025, 354
[44]   Simple Approach to Deriving Some Operator Ordering Formulas in Quantum Optics [J].
Li, Heng-Mei ;
Yuan, Hong-Chun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 49 (09) :2121-2130
[45]   Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model [J].
Kanso, A ;
Gromaire, MC ;
Gaume, E ;
Tassin, B ;
Chebbo, G .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (04) :77-84
[46]   Quantifying the effects of subsurface heterogeneity on hillslope runoff using a stochastic approach [J].
Meyerhoff, Steven B. ;
Maxwell, Reed M. .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 19 (08) :1515-1530
[47]   HERMITE POLYNOMIAL APPROACH FOR SOLVING SINGULAR PERTURBATED DELAY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS [J].
Yuzbasi, Suayip ;
Savasaneril, Nurcan Baykus .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND ARTS, 2020, (04) :845-854
[48]   Global asymptotics of hermite polynomials via Riemann-Hilbert approach [J].
Wong, R. ;
Zhang, L. .
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS-SERIES B, 2007, 7 (03) :661-682
[49]   Stochastic model updating utilizing Bayesian approach and Gaussian process model [J].
Wan, Hua-Ping ;
Ren, Wei-Xin .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 70-71 :245-268
[50]   Using a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation; comparison of the GLUE and MCMC methods [J].
Makowski, D ;
Wallach, D ;
Tremblay, M .
AGRONOMIE, 2002, 22 (02) :191-203