Performance evaluation of a manufacturing process under uncertainty using Bayesian networks

被引:46
作者
Nannapaneni, Saideep [1 ]
Mahadevan, Sankaran [1 ]
Rachuri, Sudarsan [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] NIST, Syst Integrat Div, Engn Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Manufacturing; Bayesian network; Sensitivity analysis; Energy consumption; ERROR ESTIMATION; INFORMATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a systematic framework using Bayesian networks to aggregate the uncertainty from multiple sources for the purpose of uncertainty quantification (UQ) in the prediction of performance of a manufacturing process. Energy consumption, one of the key metrics of manufacturing process sustain ability performance, is used to illustrate the proposed methodology. The prediction of energy consumption is not straightforward due to the presence of uncertainty in many process variables and the models used for prediction. The uncertainty is both aleatory (statistical) and epistemic (lack of knowledge); both sources of uncertainty are considered in the proposed UQ methodology. The uncertainty sources occur at different stages of the manufacturing process and do not combine in a straightforward manner, thus a Bayesian network approach is found to be advantageous in uncertainty aggregation. A dimension reduction approach through variance-based global sensitivity analysis is proposed to reduce the number of variables in the system and facilitate scalability in high-dimensional problems. The proposed methodologies for uncertainty quantification and dimension reduction are demonstrated using two examples an injection molding process and a welding process. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 959
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, THESIS VANDERBILT U
  • [2] Integration of heterogeneous information in SHM models
    Bartram, Gregory
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2014, 21 (03) : 403 - 422
  • [3] BENSI M, 2010, P INT S REL ENG RISK
  • [4] Brooks SP, 1998, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V47, P69, DOI 10.1111/1467-9884.00117
  • [5] Uncertainty analyses in fault trees and Bayesian networks using FORM SORM metlnods
    Castillo, E
    Sarabia, JM
    Solares, C
    Gómez, P
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1999, 65 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [6] Combining disparate sources of information in the safety assessment of software-based systems
    Dahll, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 195 (03) : 307 - 319
  • [7] Bayesian networks and information retrieval:: an introduction to the special issue
    de Campos, LM
    Fernández-Luna, JM
    Huete, JF
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2004, 40 (05) : 727 - 733
  • [8] Energy metrics for product assembly equipment and processes
    Feng, Shaw C.
    Senthilkumaran, Kumaraguru
    Brown, Christopher U.
    Kulvatunyou, Boonserm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 65 : 142 - 151
  • [9] Friedman N., 2004, Journal of Computational Biology, V7, P601
  • [10] LEARNING BAYESIAN NETWORKS - THE COMBINATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND STATISTICAL-DATA
    HECKERMAN, D
    GEIGER, D
    CHICKERING, DM
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 20 (03) : 197 - 243