Factors related to treatment outcomes in low-risk gestational neoplasia

被引:3
|
作者
Turkmen, Osman [1 ]
Basaran, Derman [1 ]
Karalok, Alper [1 ]
Kimyon, Gunsu Comert [1 ]
Tasci, Tolga [1 ]
Ureyen, Isin [1 ]
Tulunay, Gokhan [1 ]
Turan, Taner [1 ]
机构
[1] Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Womens Health Teaching & Res, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Etlik St, TR-06010 Ankara, Turkey
来源
TUMORI JOURNAL | 2017年 / 103卷 / 02期
关键词
Gestational-trophoblastic-neoplasia; Human-chorionic-gonadotropin; Methotrexate; LOW-DOSE METHOTREXATE; FACTOR SCORING SYSTEM; TROPHOBLASTIC NEOPLASIA; FOLINIC ACID; DISEASE; CHEMOTHERAPY; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RESISTANCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.5301/tj.5000550
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the factors associated with nnethotrexate (MTX) resistance in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). Methods: A total of 63 patients with low-risk GTN according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria were included. A total of 37 (587%) patients were treated with successive doses of 1 mg/kg intramuscular (IM) MTX on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and 0.1 mg/kg IM folinic acid (FA) on days 2, 4, 6, and 8, until 13 -human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels were normalized. After the beta-hCG value dropped to the normal level, an additional cycle of MTX/FA was administered. This protocol is defined as the standard protocol. In a watchful waiting protocol, the same 8-day IM MTX/FA regimen was given only once (n = 8) or twice (n = 18) to 26 (41.3%) patients and patients in whom beta-hCG values declined were subjected to follow-up and no additional cycles were administered as long as there was a decrease in beta-hCG value. Clinical response and factors affecting therapeutic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Of 63 patients, 47 (74.3%) were cured with primary MTX/FA treatment irrespective of any protocol. Of the 16 patients who were not able to be treated with primary MTX/FA, 3 were treated with single-agent actinomycin D and 11 were treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that a pretreatment beta-hCG level of 5000 IU/L was related to reduced therapeutic response (p = 0.001). The FIGO score, antecedent gestational pathology, and treatment with standard or watchful waiting protocol were not related to treatment response. Conclusions: The level of beta-hCG prior to therapy is an important factor for predicting therapeutic outcomes. It should be noted that the success of the therapy decreases notably in case of high beta-hCG level.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Folinic acid rescue during methotrexate treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia - How much is just right?
    Poli, Juliana Gomes
    Paiva, Gabriela
    Freitas, Fernanda
    Mora, Paulo
    Coca Velarde, Luis Guillermo
    Amim Junior, Joffre
    Rezende Filho, Jorge
    Elias, Kevin M.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Braga, Antonio
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (03) : 638 - 644
  • [22] Recurrence and resistance risk factors in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Branco-Silva, Mariza
    Maesta, Izildinha
    Horowitz, Neil
    Elias, Kevin
    Seckl, Michael
    Berkowitz, Ross
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024,
  • [23] Response to Chemotherapy in Overweight/Obese Patients With Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Maesta, Izildinha
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Goldstein, Donald P.
    Bernstein, Marilyn R.
    Ramirez, Luz Angela C.
    Moulder, Janelle
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (04) : 734 - 740
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of second curettage for treatment of low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Batman, Samantha
    Skeith, Ashley
    Allen, Allison
    Munro, Elizabeth
    Caughey, Aaron
    Bruegl, Amanda
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (03) : 711 - 715
  • [25] Risk factors for second-line dactinomycin failure after methotrexate treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective study
    Hoeijmakers, Y. M.
    Sweep, F. C. G. J.
    Lok, C. A. R.
    Ottevanger, P. B.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (09) : 1139 - 1145
  • [26] Management and Outcomes of Patients with Stage I and III Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Treated in Sheffield, UK, from 1997-2006
    Macdonald, Madeleine C.
    Hancock, Barry W.
    Winter, Matthew C.
    Coleman, Robert E.
    Tidy, John A.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 61 (7-8) : 341 - 346
  • [27] Eight days versus weekly intramuscular methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Anfinan, N. M.
    Al Khatieb, M. T.
    Sait, H. K.
    Sait, M. K.
    Baghlaf, O. A.
    Mousa, A. A.
    Sait, K. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (02) : 227 - 232
  • [28] Early prediction of treatment resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using population kinetic modelling of hCG measurements
    You, B.
    Harvey, R.
    Henin, E.
    Mitchell, H.
    Golfier, F.
    Savage, P. M.
    Tod, M.
    Wilbaux, M.
    Freyer, G.
    Seckl, M. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (09) : 1810 - 1816
  • [29] Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia and Methotrexate Resistance Predictors of Response to Treatment with Actinomycin D and Need for Combination Chemotherapy
    Growdon, Whitfield B.
    Wolfberg, Adam J.
    Goldstein, Donald P.
    Feltmate, Colleen M.
    Chinchilla, Manuel E.
    Lieberman, Ellice S.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 55 (7-8) : 279 - 284
  • [30] Does methotrexate (MTX) dosing in a 8-day MTX/FA regimen for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia affect updates outcomes? The MITO-9 study
    Mangili, Giorgia
    Cioffi, Raffaella
    Danese, Saverio
    Frigerio, Luigi
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Cormio, Gennaro
    Rabaiotti, Emanuela
    Scarfone, Giovanna
    Gadducci, Angiolo
    Bergamini, Alice
    Pisano, Carmela
    Candiani, Massimo
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (03) : 449 - 452