Organisational design and development in a large rail tunnel project - Influence of heuristics and mantras

被引:42
作者
Eriksson, Therese [1 ,2 ]
Kadefors, Anna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Real Estate & Construct Management, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Infrastructure projects; Coordination; Heuristics; Decision-making; Megaprojects; Design; ROUTINES; CAPABILITIES; UNCERTAINTY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In design phases of large and complex infrastructure projects, a main challenge is to coordinate numerous technical specialists. Heuristics, or cognitive rules of thumb, is one factor that may influence the development of organisational structures and routines, especially if project management discretion is high: A longitudinal case study, comprising non-participant observation over three years, was carried out of the early design phase of a major railway tunnel project. Availability and familiarity heuristics were found important, as well as coordination neglect a general tendency to focus more on partitioning tasks than on coordination needs. Satisficing, meaning that the first acceptable organising solution is selected and retained, was found to be strong in temporary, transitory contexts. Shared heuristics were manifest as short catchphrases, or mantras. Clients should develop meta-routines and meta-functions to support adaptation within, and learning between, projects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 503
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   Managing the Social Trajectory: A Practice Perspective on Project Management [J].
O'Leary, Tim ;
Williams, Terry .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 60 (03) :566-580
[42]   Management of flexibility in projects [J].
The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Høgskoleringen 7A, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway .
Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2006, 1 (66-74)
[43]   Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives [J].
Parmigiani, Anne ;
Howard-Grenville, Jennifer .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2011, 5 :413-453
[44]   Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior [J].
Pentland, Brian T. ;
Haerem, Thorvald .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 2, 2015, 2 :465-487
[45]   The changing paradigms of project management [J].
Pollack, Julien .
International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25 (03) :266-274
[46]   Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations [J].
Sanderson, Joe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (04) :432-443
[47]   RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
SIMON, HA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1956, 63 (02) :129-138
[48]  
Simon HA., 1972, DECISION ORG, V1, P161, DOI DOI 10.1093/EREA/27.3.325
[49]   Relating, reflecting and routinizing: Developing project competence in cooperation with others [J].
Söderlund, Jonas ;
Vaagaasar, Anne Live ;
Andersen, Erling S. .
International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26 (05) :517-526
[50]  
Soderlund J., 2011, OXFORD HDB PROJECT M