Developing a new health-related policy analysis tool: An action research cooperative inquiry approach

被引:2
作者
Casey, Mary [1 ]
Rohde, Daniela [1 ]
Brady, Anne-Marie [2 ]
Fealy, Gerard [1 ]
Hegarty, Josephine [3 ]
Kennedy, Catriona [4 ]
McNamara, Martin [1 ]
Nicholson, Emma [1 ]
O'Connell, Rhona [3 ]
O'Connor, Laserina [1 ]
O'Leary, Denise [1 ]
O'Reilly, Pauline [4 ]
Stokes, Diarmuid [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Cork, Ireland
[4] Univ Limerick, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Lib, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
health policy; health services research; nursing; policymaking; COUNTRIES; SECTOR; DOCUMENTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.12804
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aim To develop a tool for the analysis of nursing, midwifery and health-related policy and professional guidance documents. Background Analysis tools can aid both policy evaluation and policy development. However, no framework for analysing the content of professional regulation and guidance documents among health care professionals currently exists. Method This study used an action research, cooperative inquiry design. Data were generated from two integrative literature reviews and discussions held during the cooperative inquiry meetings. Results A set of key themes to be considered in the development or evaluation of health policy or professional regulation and guidance documents were identified. These themes formed the basis of the six domains considered by the Health-related Policy Analysis Tool (HrPAT): Context, Process, Content, Stakeholder Consultation, Implementation and Evaluation. Conclusion Use of the HrPAT can assist in policy development, evaluation and implementation, as well as providing some retrospective analytical insights into existing health policies. Implication for Nursing Management Professional regulation documents, guidelines and policy reports should be capable of being scrutinized for their content, quality and developmental process. The HrPAT can assist relevant stakeholders in the development, analysis and evaluation of such documents, including local, service-level policies and guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1241
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] "No One Has Yet Properly Articulated What We Are Trying to Achieve": A Discourse Analysis of Interviews With Revalidation Policy Leaders in the United Kingdom
    Archer, Julian
    de Bere, Sam Regan
    Nunn, Suzanne
    Clark, Jonathan
    Corrigan, Oonagh
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [2] Evaluation of Health in All Policies: concept, theory and application
    Baum, Fran
    Lawless, Angela
    Delany, Toni
    Macdougall, Colin
    Williams, Carmel
    Broderick, Danny
    Wildgoose, Deborah
    Harris, Elizabeth
    McDermott, Dennis
    Kickbusch, Ilona
    Popay, Jennie
    Marmot, Michael
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 29 : 130 - 142
  • [3] Guidance for Evidence-Informed Policies about Health Systems: Rationale for and Challenges of Guidance Development
    Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier
    Lavis, John N.
    Lewin, Simon
    Atun, Rifat
    Rottingen, John-Arne
    Droeschel, Daniel
    Beck, Lise
    Abalos, Edgardo
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Gilson, Lucy
    Oliver, Sandy
    Wyss, Kaspar
    Tugwell, Peter
    Kulier, Regina
    Pang, Tikki
    Haines, Andy
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (03)
  • [4] AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Browman, George P.
    Burgers, Jako S.
    Cluzeau, Francoise
    Feder, Gene
    Fervers, Beatrice
    Graham, Ian D.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Hanna, Steven E.
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Makarski, Julie
    Zitzelsberger, Louise
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) : E839 - E842
  • [5] Addressing the theoretical, practical and ethical challenges inherent in prospective health policy analysis
    Buse, Kent
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2008, 23 (05) : 351 - 360
  • [6] Capilla R., 2007, SOFTWARE SERVICE VAR, P3247
  • [7] "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method
    Carroll, Christopher
    Booth, Andrew
    Leaviss, Joanna
    Rick, Jo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [8] Health policy analysis: a tool to evaluate in policy documents the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes
    Cheung, K. Katherine
    Mirzaei, Masoud
    Leeder, Stephen
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2010, 34 (04) : 405 - 413
  • [9] Coghlan D., 2014, DOING ACTION RES YOU
  • [10] Coghlan D, 2017, J CHANG MANAG, V17, P121, DOI 10.1080/14697017.2017.1301045