An integrated framework for analysing performance indicators of Indian microfinance institutions: a multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:9
作者
Bardhan, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Nag, Barnali [1 ]
Mishra, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
Tarei, Pradeep Kumar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Gandhi Inst Technol & Management, GITAM Inst Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Performance measurement; Microfinance; Decision-making; DEMATEL; ANP; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL EFFICIENCY; DETERMINANTS; OUTREACH; PRODUCTIVITY; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; STRATEGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0470
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose An amalgamation of Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytical Network Process (ANP) has been performed to develop a decision-making framework for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. A primary survey was conducted to collect real-time data from the heterogeneous stakeholders of microfinance institutions across India. The validation of the proposed framework is performed by comparing the results against the conventional method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Design/methodology/approach This study identifies various dimensions and indicators for measuring the performance of Indian microfinance institutions. Additionally, the ranking and prioritisation of the performance dimensions and indicators is obtained by considering the mutual interrelation between them. Findings The study indicates that there exists a significant dyadic relationship between financial performance and social performance for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. Governance is found to unidirectionally influence both financial and social performance. Among all the considered dimensions, financial performance of a microfinance institution is the most critical dimension for improving the overall performance. The top five performance indicators of the Indian microfinance institutions are funding source, borrowing and overhead cost, size of the firm, end-use of the money and depth of outreach. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in the context of Indian microfinance institutions; hence the scope of generalisation of the results is limited. This research considers both subjective and objective aspect of the performance dimensions and indicators from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (i.e. firm, society and regulator). The integrated framework is expected to aid in improving overall performance of microfinance institutions by focusing on the most critical (high prioritised) performance indicators. Originality/value An integrated DEMATEL-ANP framework is used in the domain of microfinance to assess the performance dimensions. This study is unique in terms of analysing performance of microfinance institutions from the perspective of heterogeneous stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:2711 / 2740
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Shen, Yung-Chi
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2017, 51 (06) : 2865 - 2884
  • [32] Aspect-based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ali, Sadia
    Hafeez, Yaser
    Asghar, Sohail
    Nawaz, Asif
    Saeed, Saqib
    [J]. IET SOFTWARE, 2020, 14 (05) : 482 - 492
  • [33] A Decision Support Framework for Science-Based, Multi-Stakeholder Deliberation: A Coral Reef Example
    Rehr, Amanda P.
    Small, Mitchell J.
    Bradley, Patricia
    Fisher, William S.
    Vega, Ann
    Black, Kelly
    Stockton, Tom
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 50 (06) : 1204 - 1218
  • [34] Drivers, barriers and practices of net zero economy: An exploratory knowledge based supply chain multi-stakeholder perspective framework
    Singh, Jagriti
    Pandey, Krishan Kumar
    Kumar, Anil
    Naz, Farheen
    Luthra, Sunil
    [J]. OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03) : 1059 - 1090
  • [35] How to Assess the Democratic Qualities of a Multi-stakeholder Initiative from a Habermasian Perspective? Deliberative Democracy and the Equator Principles Framework
    Martens, Wil
    van der Linden, Bastiaan
    Worsdorfer, Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 155 (04) : 1115 - 1133
  • [36] Expatriate management in hostile environments from a multi-stakeholder perspective - a systematic review
    Faeth, Pia Charlotte
    Kittler, Markus G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MOBILITY-THE HOME OF EXPATRIATE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2020, 8 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [37] Investment equilibrium of an integrated multi-stakeholder electricity-gas-hydrogen system
    Pan, Guangsheng
    Gu, Wei
    Chen, Sheng
    Lu, Yuping
    Zhou, Suyang
    Wei, Zhinong
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 150
  • [38] Coporate branding and corporate social responsibility: Toward a multi-stakeholder interpretive perspective
    Maon, Francois
    Swaen, Valerie
    De Roeck, Kenneth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 126 : 64 - 77
  • [39] A multi-stakeholder perspective on opportunities and challenges for energy efficiency improvement in university buildings
    Nair, Gireesh
    Azizi, Shoaib
    Olofsson, Thomas
    [J]. COLD CLIMATE HVAC & ENERGY 2021, 2021, 246
  • [40] Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives
    Kusters, Koen
    Buck, Louise
    de Graaf, Maartje
    Minang, Peter
    van Oosten, Cora
    Zagt, Roderick
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 62 (01) : 170 - 181