An integrated framework for analysing performance indicators of Indian microfinance institutions: a multi-stakeholder perspective

被引:9
作者
Bardhan, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Nag, Barnali [1 ]
Mishra, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
Tarei, Pradeep Kumar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Gandhi Inst Technol & Management, GITAM Inst Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Performance measurement; Microfinance; Decision-making; DEMATEL; ANP; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL EFFICIENCY; DETERMINANTS; OUTREACH; PRODUCTIVITY; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; STRATEGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0470
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose An amalgamation of Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytical Network Process (ANP) has been performed to develop a decision-making framework for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. A primary survey was conducted to collect real-time data from the heterogeneous stakeholders of microfinance institutions across India. The validation of the proposed framework is performed by comparing the results against the conventional method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Design/methodology/approach This study identifies various dimensions and indicators for measuring the performance of Indian microfinance institutions. Additionally, the ranking and prioritisation of the performance dimensions and indicators is obtained by considering the mutual interrelation between them. Findings The study indicates that there exists a significant dyadic relationship between financial performance and social performance for improving the overall performance of the microfinance institutions. Governance is found to unidirectionally influence both financial and social performance. Among all the considered dimensions, financial performance of a microfinance institution is the most critical dimension for improving the overall performance. The top five performance indicators of the Indian microfinance institutions are funding source, borrowing and overhead cost, size of the firm, end-use of the money and depth of outreach. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in the context of Indian microfinance institutions; hence the scope of generalisation of the results is limited. This research considers both subjective and objective aspect of the performance dimensions and indicators from the perspective of multiple stakeholders (i.e. firm, society and regulator). The integrated framework is expected to aid in improving overall performance of microfinance institutions by focusing on the most critical (high prioritised) performance indicators. Originality/value An integrated DEMATEL-ANP framework is used in the domain of microfinance to assess the performance dimensions. This study is unique in terms of analysing performance of microfinance institutions from the perspective of heterogeneous stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:2711 / 2740
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers to implementing the strictest environmental protection institution: a multi-stakeholder perspective from China
    Mao, Wenxin
    Wang, Wenping
    Sun, Huifang
    Luo, Dang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (31) : 39375 - 39390
  • [22] Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective
    Gupta, Kamini
    Crilly, Donal
    Greckhamer, Thomas
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (10) : 1869 - 1900
  • [23] Multi-stakeholder Governance in Cooperative Organizations: Toward a New Framework for Research?
    Leviten-Reid, Catherine
    Fairbairn, Brett
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND SOCIAL ECONOMY RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (02) : 25 - 36
  • [24] Security and compliance challenges in complex IT outsourcing arrangements: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Bachlechner, Daniel
    Thalmann, Stefan
    Maier, Ronald
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2014, 40 : 38 - 59
  • [25] Navigating psychological barriers in agricultural innovation adoption: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Chindasombatcharoen, Nopparuj
    Tsolakis, Naoum
    Kumar, Mukesh
    O'Sullivan, Eoin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 475
  • [26] Evaluation of patient engagement in medicine development: A multi-stakeholder framework with metrics
    Vat, Lidewij Eva
    Finlay, Teresa
    Robinson, Paul
    Barbareschi, Giorgio
    Boudes, Mathieu
    Diaz Ponce, Ana Maria
    Dinboeck, Michaela
    Eichmann, Lukas
    Ferrer, Elisa
    Fruytier, Sevgi E.
    Hey, Claudia
    Broerse, Jacqueline E. W.
    Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Tjerk Jan
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (02) : 491 - 506
  • [27] A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ashrafi, Mehrnaz
    Walker, Tony R.
    Magnan, Gregory M.
    Adams, Michelle
    Acciaro, Michele
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 47 (08) : 1027 - 1044
  • [28] Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Decision-Making Framework Based on Trust: A Generic Framework
    Alfantoukh, Lina
    Ruan, Yefeng
    Durresi, Arjan
    2018 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATION AND INTERNET COMPUTING (CIC 2018), 2018, : 472 - 479
  • [29] Ambiguity in performance management systems of complex multi-stakeholder organisations
    Ojiako, Udechukwu
    Bititci, Umit
    Marshall, Alasdair
    Chipulu, Maxwell
    Manville, Graham
    Muthalagu, Subha Jayanti
    Farrington, Thomas
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (14) : 1393 - 1413
  • [30] Aspect-based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi-stakeholder perspective
    Ali, Sadia
    Hafeez, Yaser
    Asghar, Sohail
    Nawaz, Asif
    Saeed, Saqib
    IET SOFTWARE, 2020, 14 (05) : 482 - 492