Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity

被引:322
作者
Brownson, Ross C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kumanyika, Shiriki K. [4 ]
Kreuter, Matthew W. [5 ]
Haire-Joshu, Debra [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Prevent Res Ctr, Brown Sch, 1 Brookings Dr,Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Alvin J Siteman Canc Ctr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dept Community Hlth & Prevent, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, Hlth Commun Res Lab, 1 Brookings Dr,Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[6] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, Ctr Diabet Translat Res, 1 Brookings Dr,Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[7] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, Ctr Obes Prevent & Policy Res, 1 Brookings Dr,Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Implementation science; Equity; Health inequities; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; POPULATION HEALTH; STRUCTURAL RACISM; CHRONIC DISEASES; INTERVENTIONS; DISPARITIES; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; DISSEMINATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is growing urgency to tackle issues of equity and justice in the USA and worldwide. Health equity, a framing that moves away from a deficit mindset of what society is doing poorly (disparities) to one that is positive about what society can achieve, is becoming more prominent in health research that uses implementation science approaches. Equity begins with justice-health differences often reflect societal injustices. Applying the perspectives and tools of implementation science has potential for immediate impact to improve health equity. Main text We propose a vision and set of action steps for making health equity a more prominent and central aim of implementation science, thus committing to conduct implementation science through equity-focused principles to achieve this vision in U.S. research and practice. We identify and discuss challenges in current health disparities approaches that do not fully consider social determinants. Implementation research challenges are outlined in three areas: limitations of the evidence base, underdeveloped measures and methods, and inadequate attention to context. To address these challenges, we offer recommendations that seek to (1) link social determinants with health outcomes, (2) build equity into all policies, (3) use equity-relevant metrics, (4) study what is already happening, (5) integrate equity into implementation models, (6) design and tailor implementation strategies, (7) connect to systems and sectors outside of health, (8) engage organizations in internal and external equity efforts, (9) build capacity for equity in implementation science, and (10) focus on equity in dissemination efforts. Conclusions Every project in implementation science should include an equity focus. For some studies, equity is the main goal of the project and a central feature of all aspects of the project. In other studies, equity is part of a project but not the singular focus. In these studies, we should, at a minimum, ensure that we "leave no one behind" and that existing disparities are not widened. With a stronger commitment to health equity from funders, researchers, practitioners, advocates, evaluators, and policy makers, we can harvest the rewards of the resources being invested in health-related research to eliminate disparities, resulting in health equity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Aarons GregoryA., 2018, Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, VSecond, P121
[2]   Race and Equity in Statewide Implementation Programs: An Application of the Policy Ecology of Implementation Framework [J].
Aby, Martha J. .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (06) :946-960
[3]   The limits of reductionism in medicine: Could systems biology offer an alternative? [J].
Ahn, Andrew C. ;
Tewari, Muneesh ;
Poon, Chi-Sang ;
Phillips, Russell S. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (06) :709-713
[4]   Social determinants as moderators of the effectiveness of health behavior change interventions: scientific gaps and opportunities [J].
Alcantara, Carmela ;
Diaz, Sarah Valentina ;
Cosenzo, Luciana Giorgio ;
Loucks, Eric B. ;
Penedo, Frank J. ;
Williams, Natasha J. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 14 (01) :132-144
[5]   Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: A blueprint for practice, research, and policy [J].
Alcaraz, Kassandra, I ;
Wiedt, Tracy L. ;
Daniels, Elvan C. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin ;
Guerra, Carmen E. ;
Wender, Richard C. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2020, 70 (01) :31-46
[6]   Addressing social determinants of noncommunicable diseases in primary care: a systematic review [J].
Allen, Luke N. ;
Smith, Robert W. ;
Simmons-Jones, Fiona ;
Roberts, Nia ;
Honney, Rory ;
Currie, Jonny .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2020, 98 (11) :754-765B
[7]  
Allen P., 2020, 35 ANN C SCI DISS IM
[8]   How is implementation research applied to advance health in low-income and middle-income countries? [J].
Alonge, Olakunle ;
Rodriguez, Daniela Cristina ;
Brandes, Neal ;
Geng, Elvin ;
Reveiz, Ludovic ;
Peters, David H. .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (02)
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, National prevention strategy
[10]  
[Anonymous], DISSEMINATION IMPLEM