Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

被引:26
作者
Nuelle, Clayton W. [1 ,2 ]
Milles, Jeffrey L. [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Ferris M. [1 ,2 ]
Stannard, James P. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Patrick A. [1 ,3 ]
Kfuri, Mauricio, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Cook, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Columbia, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Thompson Lab Regenerat Orthopaed, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Columbia Orthopaed Grp, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament; autograft; allograft; reconstruction techniques; biomechanics; DOUBLE-BUNDLE RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL INLAY; SINGLE-BUNDLE; SURGICAL-TECHNIQUE; GRAFT FIXATION; KNEE LAXITY; PART;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1593625
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
No surgical technique recreates native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) biomechanics. We compared the biomechanics of five different PCL reconstruction techniques versus the native PCL. Cadaveric knees (n = 20) were randomly assigned to one of five reconstruction techniques: Single bundle all-inside arthroscopic inlay, single bundle all-inside suspensory fixation, single bundle arthroscopic-assisted open onlay (SB-ONL), double bundle arthroscopic-assisted open inlay (DB-INL), and double bundle all-inside suspensory fixation (DB-SUSP). Each specimen was potted and connected to a servo-hydraulic load frame for testing in three conditions: PCL intact, PCL deficient, and PCL reconstructed. Testing consisted of a posterior force up to 100 N at a rate of 1 N/s at four knee flexion angles: 10, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. Three material properties were measured under each condition: load to 5 mm displacement, maximal displacement, and stiffness. Data were normalized to the native PCL, compared across techniques, compared with all PCL-intact knees and to all PCL-deficient knees using one-way analysis of variance. For load to 5 mm displacement, intact knees required significantly (p < 0.03) more load at 30 degrees of flexion than all reconstructions except the DB-SUSP. At 60 degrees of flexion, intact required significantly (p < 0.01) more load than all others except the SB-ONL. At 90 degrees, intact, SB-ONL, DB-INL, and DB-SUSP required significantly more load (p < 0.05). Maximal displacement testing showed the intact to have significantly (p < 0.02) less laxity than all others except the DB-INL and DB-SUSP at 60 degrees. At 90 degrees the intact showed significantly (p < 0.01) less laxity than all others except the DB-SUSP. The intact was significantly stiffer than all others at 30 degrees (p < 0.03) and 60 degrees (p < 0.01). Finally, the intact was significantly (p < 0.05) stiffer than all others except the DB-SUSP at 90 degrees. No technique matched the exact properties of the native PCL, but the double bundle reconstructions more closely recreated the native biomechanics immediately after implantation, with the DB-SUSP coming closest to the native ligament. This study contributes new data for consideration in PCL reconstruction technique choice.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 531
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of autograft and allograft tendons in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A meta-analysis
    Tian, Peng
    Hu, Wen-qing
    Li, Zhi-jun
    Sun, Xiao-lei
    Ma, Xin-long
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (27)
  • [32] Biomechanical considerations for graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Banovetz, Mark T.
    Kennedy, Nicholas I.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    Moatshe, Gilbert
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2023, 8
  • [33] Biomechanical considerations for graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Banoyetz, Mark T.
    Kennedy, Nicholas, I
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    Moatshe, Gilbert
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2023, 8
  • [34] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Outcomes
    Voos, James E.
    Mauro, Craig S.
    Wente, Todd
    Warren, Russell F.
    Wickiewicz, Thomas L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (01) : 222 - 231
  • [35] Biomechanical comparison of graft structures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Breck R. Lord
    Hadi El-Daou
    Bhushan M. Sabnis
    Chinmay M. Gupte
    Adrian M. Wilson
    Andrew A. Amis
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 559 - 568
  • [36] Biomechanical comparison of graft structures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lord, Breck R.
    El-Daou, Hadi
    Sabnis, Bhushan M.
    Gupte, Chinmay M.
    Wilson, Adrian M.
    Amis, Andrew A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (02) : 559 - 568
  • [37] Anatomical posterior cruciate ligament transplantation - A biomechanical analysis
    Davis, Daniel K.
    Goltz, David H.
    Fithian, Donald C.
    D'Lima, Darryl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (07) : 1126 - 1133
  • [38] Posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction
    Fanelli, Gregory C.
    Edson, Craig J.
    Reinheimer, Kristin N.
    Garofalo, Raffaele
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2007, 15 (04) : 168 - 175
  • [39] Rehabilitation after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lee, Y. S.
    Kim, N. K.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2011, 62 (04) : 291 - 295
  • [40] Comparison of the operation of arthroscopic tibial inlay and traditional tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lu, Daifeng
    Xiao, Mochao
    Lian, Yongyun
    Zhou, Yong
    Liu, Xuefeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (10): : 3193 - 3201