Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

被引:26
|
作者
Nuelle, Clayton W. [1 ,2 ]
Milles, Jeffrey L. [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Ferris M. [1 ,2 ]
Stannard, James P. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Patrick A. [1 ,3 ]
Kfuri, Mauricio, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Cook, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Columbia, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Thompson Lab Regenerat Orthopaed, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Columbia Orthopaed Grp, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament; autograft; allograft; reconstruction techniques; biomechanics; DOUBLE-BUNDLE RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL INLAY; SINGLE-BUNDLE; SURGICAL-TECHNIQUE; GRAFT FIXATION; KNEE LAXITY; PART;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1593625
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
No surgical technique recreates native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) biomechanics. We compared the biomechanics of five different PCL reconstruction techniques versus the native PCL. Cadaveric knees (n = 20) were randomly assigned to one of five reconstruction techniques: Single bundle all-inside arthroscopic inlay, single bundle all-inside suspensory fixation, single bundle arthroscopic-assisted open onlay (SB-ONL), double bundle arthroscopic-assisted open inlay (DB-INL), and double bundle all-inside suspensory fixation (DB-SUSP). Each specimen was potted and connected to a servo-hydraulic load frame for testing in three conditions: PCL intact, PCL deficient, and PCL reconstructed. Testing consisted of a posterior force up to 100 N at a rate of 1 N/s at four knee flexion angles: 10, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. Three material properties were measured under each condition: load to 5 mm displacement, maximal displacement, and stiffness. Data were normalized to the native PCL, compared across techniques, compared with all PCL-intact knees and to all PCL-deficient knees using one-way analysis of variance. For load to 5 mm displacement, intact knees required significantly (p < 0.03) more load at 30 degrees of flexion than all reconstructions except the DB-SUSP. At 60 degrees of flexion, intact required significantly (p < 0.01) more load than all others except the SB-ONL. At 90 degrees, intact, SB-ONL, DB-INL, and DB-SUSP required significantly more load (p < 0.05). Maximal displacement testing showed the intact to have significantly (p < 0.02) less laxity than all others except the DB-INL and DB-SUSP at 60 degrees. At 90 degrees the intact showed significantly (p < 0.01) less laxity than all others except the DB-SUSP. The intact was significantly stiffer than all others at 30 degrees (p < 0.03) and 60 degrees (p < 0.01). Finally, the intact was significantly (p < 0.05) stiffer than all others except the DB-SUSP at 90 degrees. No technique matched the exact properties of the native PCL, but the double bundle reconstructions more closely recreated the native biomechanics immediately after implantation, with the DB-SUSP coming closest to the native ligament. This study contributes new data for consideration in PCL reconstruction technique choice.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 531
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENT POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
    Guo, Na
    Qi, Yansong
    Yang, Biao
    Han, Zhonghao
    Hu, Lei
    Xu, Yongsheng
    Wang, Tianmiao
    Yu, Jiakuo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 18 (08)
  • [2] Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests
    Yasuharu Hiraga
    Yasuyuki Ishibashi
    Eiichi Tsuda
    Harehiko Tsukada Satoshi Toh
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2006, 14 : 13 - 19
  • [3] Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests
    Hiraga, Y
    Ishibashi, Y
    Tsuda, E
    Toh, H
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [4] Onlay Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical and Bicortical Tibial Fixation
    de Albuquerque, Joao Bourbon, II
    Pfeiffer, Ferris
    Stannard, James P.
    Cook, James L.
    Kfuri, Mauricio
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10) : 972 - 978
  • [5] Comparison of the Clinical Results of Three Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
    Kim, Sung-Jae
    Kim, Tae-Eun
    Jo, Seung-Bae
    Kung, Yun-Pei
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (11) : 2543 - 2549
  • [6] Posterior Cruciate Ligament All-Inside Reconstruction
    Martin, R. Kyle
    Melugin, Heath P.
    Freychet, Benjamin
    Krych, Aaron J.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Levy, Bruce A.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2020, 28 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [7] Tibial Inlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Stannard, James P.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2020, 28 (01) : 14 - 17
  • [8] Biomechanical comparison of proximal, distal, and anatomic tibial tunnel for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Teng, Yuanjun
    Jia, Gengxin
    Lu, Fan
    Da, Lijun
    Teng, Fei
    Zhao, Lianggong
    Geng, Bin
    Yun, Xiangdong
    Han, Hua
    Xia, Yayi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 237 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [9] The biomechanical characteristics of arthroscopic tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro comparison of tibial graft tunnel placement
    Benedetto, Karl Peter
    Hoffelner, Thomas
    Osti, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (11) : 2363 - 2368
  • [10] Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Knapik, Derrick M.
    Gopinatth, Varun
    Jackson, Garrett R.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Smith, Matthew V.
    Matava, Matthew J.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 9 (01)