Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2.: The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod

被引:46
作者
Lisson, SN
Mendham, NJ
Carberry, PS
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Dept Agr Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] CSIRO Trop Agr, Agr Prod Syst Res Unit, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
hemp; model; phenology; flowering; photoperiod response;
D O I
10.1071/EA99059
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The duration from sowing to flowering is an important determinant of fibre yield potential in hemp, since maximum stem yield occurs shortly after flowering. As a short-day plant, daylength has a key influence on the timing of flowering in hemp. This paper reports on studies into the effect of photoperiod on the thermal time duration from sowing to flowering for 2 hemp cultivars, and develops parameters to enable simulation of post-emergent phenology in the hemp model described in the final paper of this series. The hemp model divides the post-emergent period into a vegetative phase that ends at floral initiation, a flower development phase (FDP) between flower initiation and appearance, and a short phase between first flower appearance and harvest maturity (male anthesis). The vegetative phase is further divided into a temperature-dependent basic vegetative phase (BVP) and a daylength-dependent photoperiod induced phase (PIP). For a short-day plant, the duration of PIP is assumed to be zero degree days at daylengths below a base or maximum optimum photoperiod (MOP). Daylengths in excess of the MOP lead to an increase in thermal time within PIP, the duration of which is determined by a genotype's photoperiod sensitivity (PS). Two hemp genotypes, Kompolti and Futura 77, were exposed to 6 different photoperiod regimes ranging from 8 to 16 h in a growth chamber. Thermal time durations from emergence to flower initiation and first flower formation (harvest) were calculated from thermograph plots. The flowering responses for the 2 cultivars were typical for a short-day plant, with flowering occurring rapidly in daylengths less than about 14 h and with increasing delay at longer photoperiods. With the exception of a longer thermal time duration from flower formation to harvest maturity in the case of Kompolti, the 2 cultivars had similar values for the key phenology parameters. Respectively, for Futura and Kompolti: BVP was 383 degrees Cd and 390 degrees Cd, MOP was 14 h and 13.8 h, PS was 266 degrees Cd/h and 252 degrees Cd/h, and FDP was 76.8 degrees Cd and 80.2 degrees Cd.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 417
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] PHOTOPERIODIC RESPONSES OF HEMP
    BORTHWICK, HA
    SCULLY, NJ
    [J]. BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1954, 116 (01): : 14 - 29
  • [2] A SIMULATION-MODEL OF KENAF FOR ASSISTING FIBER INDUSTRY PLANNING IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA .1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND PHENOLOGICAL MODEL
    CARBERRY, PS
    MUCHOW, RC
    WILLIAMS, R
    STURTZ, JD
    MCCOWN, RL
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1992, 43 (07): : 1501 - 1513
  • [3] EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD ON FLOWERING IN SOYA BEAN [GLYCINE-MAX (L) MERRILL] - A QUANTITATIVE MODEL
    HADLEY, P
    ROBERTS, EH
    SUMMERFIELD, RJ
    MINCHIN, FR
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1984, 53 (05) : 669 - 681
  • [4] HESLOP-HARRISON J., 1969, The induction of flowering. Some case histories., P205
  • [5] HESLOPHARRISON J, 1972, PHYSL DEV SEEDS SEXU, P13
  • [6] Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 4.: Model description and validation
    Lisson, SN
    Mendham, NJ
    Carberry, PS
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (03): : 425 - 432
  • [7] LISSON SN, 1998, THESIS U TASMANIA HO
  • [8] PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF ALFALFA (MEDICAGO-SATIVA L) CULTIVARS
    MAJOR, DJ
    HANNA, MR
    BEASLEY, BW
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [9] TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD EFFECTS MEDIATED BY THE SORGHUM MATURITY GENES
    MAJOR, DJ
    ROOD, SB
    MILLER, FR
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (02) : 305 - 310