Use of transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography in ventilated pediatric patients: Derivation of cardiac output

被引:54
作者
Tibby, SM [1 ]
Hatherill, M [1 ]
Murdoch, IA [1 ]
机构
[1] Guys Hosp, Dept Pediat Intens Care, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
cardiac output; hemodynamics; Doppler; ultrasonography; flow velocity; transesophageal; stroke volume; thermodilution; child; infant;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-200006000-00061
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To ascertain if cardiac output (CO) could be derived from blood flow velocity measured in the descending aorta of ventilated children by transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography (TED) without the need for direct aortic cross sectional area measurement, and to evaluate the ability of TED to follow changes in CO when compared with femoral artery thermodilution. Design: Prospective, comparison study. Setting: A 16-bed pediatric intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: A total of 100 ventilated infants and children aged 4 days to 18 yrs (median age, 27 months). Diagnoses included postcardiac surgery (n = 58), sepsis/multiple organ failure (0 = 32), respiratory disease (n = 5), and other (n = 5). A total of 55 patients were receiving inotropes or vasodilators. Interventions: When patients were hemodynamically stable, a TED probe was placed into the distal esophagus to obtain optimal signal, and minute distance (MD) was recorded. Five consecutive MD measurements were made concurrently with five femoral artery thermodilution measurements, and the concurrent measurements were averaged. CO was then manipulated by fluid administration or inotrope adjustment, and the readings were repeated. Measurements and Main Results: Femoral artery thermodilution CO ranged from 0.32 to 9.19 L/min, (median, 2.46 L/min), and encompassed a wide range of high and low flow states. Theoretical consideration revealed the optimal TED estimate for CO to be (MD x patient height(2) x 10(-7)). Linear regression analysis yielded a power function model such that: estimated CO = 1.158 x (MD x height(2) x 10(-7))(0.785), r(2) = 0.879, standard error of the estimate = 0.266. Inclusion of a correction factor for potential changes in aortic cross-sectional area with hypo- and hypertension did not appreciably improve the predictive value of the model. MD was able to follow percentage changes in CO, giving a mean bias of 0.87% (95% confidence interval -0.85% to 2.59%), and limits of agreement of +/- 16.82%. The median coefficient of variation for MD was 3.3% Conclusions: TED provides a clinically accurate estimate of CO across the entire pediatric age range and is able to follow changes in CO.
引用
收藏
页码:2045 / 2050
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
BLAND M, 1987, INTRO MED STAT, P277
[3]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION COMPARED TO PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IN THE HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
EISENBERG, PR ;
JAFFE, AS ;
SCHUSTER, DP .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1984, 12 (07) :549-553
[4]   THE EFFECT OF VARIATIONS ON PULSED DOPPLER SAMPLING SITE ON CALCULATION OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN OPEN-CHEST DOGS [J].
FISHER, DC ;
SAHN, DJ ;
FRIEDMAN, MJ ;
LARSON, D ;
VALDESCRUZ, LM ;
HOROWITZ, S ;
GOLDBERG, SJ ;
ALLEN, HD .
CIRCULATION, 1983, 67 (02) :370-376
[5]   TRANSESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER SCANNING VERSUS THERMODILUTION DURING GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - AN INITIAL COMPARISON OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT TECHNIQUES [J].
FREUND, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 153 (05) :490-494
[6]  
GLANTZ SA, 1990, PRIMER APPL REGRESSI, P157
[7]  
HILLEL Z, 1988, Anesthesiology (Hagerstown), V69, pA11, DOI 10.1097/00000542-198809010-00011
[8]   Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients [J].
Lefrant, JY ;
Bruelle, P ;
Aya, AGM ;
Saissi, G ;
Dauzat, M ;
de La Coussaye, JE ;
Eledjam, JJ .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (04) :347-352
[9]  
LIST W, 1987, Anesthesiology (Hagerstown), V67, pA178, DOI 10.1097/00000542-198709001-00178
[10]  
LNNE T, 1992, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V18, P451