Synergies of Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Systematic Review of Student Outcomes

被引:23
作者
Blumenstein, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Sci, 23 Symonds St, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Analytics framework; collaborative learning; effect size; higher education; learning analytics; learning design; learning gain; personalized learning; online learning; self-regulation; student learning; HIGHER-EDUCATION; ONLINE COURSES; PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE; SELF; SATISFACTION; ACHIEVEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; VARIABLES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2020.73.3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The field of learning analytics (LA) has seen a gradual shift from purely data-driven approaches to more holistic views of improving student learning outcomes through data-informed learning design (LD). Despite the growing potential of LA in higher education (HE), the benefits are not yet convincing to the practitioner, in particular aspects of aligning LA data with LD toward desired learning outcomes. This review presents a systematic evaluation of effect sizes reported in 38 key studies in pursuit of effective LA approaches to measuring student learning gain for the enhancement of HE pedagogy and delivery. Large positive effects on student outcomes were found in LDs that fostered socio-collaborative and independent learning skills. Recent trends in personalization of learner feedback identified a need for the integration of student-idiosyncratic factors to improve the student experience and academic outcomes. Finally, key findings are developed into a new three-level framework, the LA Learning Gain Design (LALGD) model, to align meaningful data capture with pedagogical intentions and their learning outcomes. Suitable for various settings - face to face, blended, or fully online - the model contributes to data-informed learning and teaching pedagogies in HE.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / +
页数:29
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The use of an online learning and teaching system for monitoring computer aided design student participation and predicting student success [J].
Akhtar, S. ;
Warburton, S. ;
Xu, W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2017, 27 (02) :251-270
[2]   Analytics-Enabled Teaching as Design: Reconceptualisation and Call for Research [J].
Alhadad, Sakinah S. J. ;
Thompson, Kate ;
Knight, Simon ;
Lewis, Melinda ;
Lodge, Jason M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE (LAK'18): TOWARDS USER-CENTRED LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2018, :427-435
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, GUIDELINES PERFORMIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 4 INT C LEARN AN K, DOI [10.1145/2567574.2567585, DOI 10.1145/2567574.2567585]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT C INF SYST ICIS
[6]  
Baker C., 2010, J ED ONLINE, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2
[7]   A Conceptual Framework linking Learning Design with Learning Analytics [J].
Bakharia, Aneesha ;
Corrin, Linda ;
de Barba, Paula ;
Kennedy, Gregor ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Mulder, Raoul ;
Williams, David ;
Dawson, Shane ;
Lockyer, Lori .
LAK '16 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE,, 2016, :329-338
[8]   Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment [J].
Biggs, J .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) :347-364
[9]   Programming Pluralism: Using Learning Analytics to Detect Patterns in the Learning of Computer Programming [J].
Blikstein, Paulo ;
Worsley, Marcelo ;
Piech, Chris ;
Sahami, Mehran ;
Cooper, Steven ;
Koller, Daphne .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2014, 23 (04) :561-599
[10]  
Blumenstein M., 2018, Learning Analytics in the Classroom, P185