Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Jr Braided Stent Versus Atlas Self-Expandable Stent for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience

被引:10
|
作者
Monteiro, Andre [1 ]
Cortez, Gustavo M. [1 ]
Aghaebrahim, Amin [1 ]
Sauvageau, Eric [1 ]
Hanel, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Neurol Inst, Lyerly Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
Aneurysm; Ruptured; Angioplasty; Intracranial aneurysm; Stents; ASSISTED COILING; LVIS JR; EMBOLIZATION; DEVICE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyaa458
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Neuroform Atlas Stent and Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) and LVIS Jr stents are used to treat intracranial aneurysms (IAs), but their safety, performance, and outcomes have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To compare the technical performance and outcomes of Atlas and LVIS Jr stents for treatment of IAs. METHODS: IAs treated by stent-assisted coiling using an Atlas (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) or LVIS Jr (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, California) device between January 2014 to November 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, aneurysm size and location, technical difficulties, and clinical and angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, (mean age 64.2 11.8 yr, 72.7% female) with 121 aneurysms underwent stent-assisted coiling with deployment of Atlas (n = 64) or LVIS Jr (n = 57) stents. Mean aneurysm size was 6.2 +/- 2.7 mm. Immediate rates of Raymond-Roy (RR) 1/2 were 89.0% (57/64) and 80.7% (46/57) for the Atlas and LVIS Jr groups, respectively. Neither group had major postoperative thromboembolic complications; however, 15.8% (9/57) of the LVIS Jr procedures had technical issues. Additionally, 88.5% (46/52) and 91.2% (33/36) of patients in the Atlas and LVIS Jr groups had RR 1/2 at a mean follow-up of 13.6 and 18.7 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of IAs with Atlas and LVIS Jr stents results in favorable clinical outcomes and angiographic results at follow-up, with low rates of recurrence and retreatment, suggesting both devices are safe and effective. Notably, LVIS Jr had more technical problems than Atlas.
引用
收藏
页码:E170 / E178
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative analysis of long term effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent versus low profile visualized intraluminal stent/Woven EndoBridge devices in treatment of wide necked intracranial aneurysms
    Salem, Mohamed M.
    Jankowitz, Brian T.
    Burkhardt, Jan-Karl
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Zaidat, Osama O.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (11) : 1115 - +
  • [12] Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with low profile visualized intraluminal support stent
    Tang, Haishuang
    Lu, Zhiwen
    Zeng, Zhangwei
    Zuo, Qiao
    Li, Qiang
    Xu, Fengfeng
    Huang, Qinghai
    Liu, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 90 : 256 - 261
  • [13] Comparative Analysis of the Low-Profile Acclino Stent and the Enterprise Stent for the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Goertz, Lukas
    Zopfs, David
    Pennig, Lenhard
    Zaeske, Charlotte
    Timmer, Marco
    Turowski, Bernd
    Kaschner, Marius
    Borggrefe, Jan
    Schoenfeld, Michael
    Schlamann, Marc
    Kabbasch, Christoph
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 182 : E517 - E524
  • [14] Endovascular intervention with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent for ruptured, very small, wide-necked, intracranial aneurysms
    Li, Jian
    Xu, De-Cai
    Liu, Hou-Yin
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 71 (08) : 1972 - 1975
  • [15] Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Novel Low Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support EVO Stent: Multicenter Early Feasibility Experience
    Foo, Michelle
    Maingard, Julian
    Hall, Jonathan
    Ren, Yifan
    Mitreski, Goran
    Slater, Lee-Anne
    Chandra, Ronil
    Chong, Winston
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Russell, Jeremy
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Brooks, Mark
    Asadi, Hamed
    NEUROINTERVENTION, 2021, 16 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [16] Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device
    Samaniego, Edgar A.
    Abdo, German
    Hanel, Ricardo A.
    Lima, Andrey
    Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago
    Dabus, Guilherme
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (10) : 1030 - 1033
  • [17] Long-term outcomes of Y-stent-assisted coil embolization using Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior (LVIS Jr) for intracranial bifurcation aneurysms
    Endo, Hideki
    Mitome-Mishima, Yumiko
    Suzuki, Kazumoto
    Yatomi, Kenji
    Teranishi, Kohsuke
    Oishi, Hidenori
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 217
  • [18] Treatment of wide-necked aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device: a multicenter experience
    Grossberg, J. A.
    Hanel, R. A.
    Dabus, G.
    Keigher, K.
    Haussen, D. C.
    Sauvageau, E.
    Linfante, I.
    Gonsales, D.
    Salinas, P. Aguilar
    Bouslama, M.
    Mayich, M.
    Nogueira, R. G.
    Lopes, D. K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2017, 9 (11) : 1098 - 1102
  • [19] Enterprise stents versus low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents for stent-assisted coiling of unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms
    Wu, Zhi-Ping
    Yin, Jian-Lin
    Liu, Shan-Kai
    Ji, Song
    Liu, Jian-Yu
    Wang, Hai-Lan
    Zhang, Yi-Sheng
    Zhang, Da-Zhong
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (05) : 1855 - 1865
  • [20] Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Tiny Intracranial Aneurysms with Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Device
    Wu, Pei
    Ocak, Pinar Eser
    Wang, Dianhong
    Ocak, Umut
    Xu, Shancai
    Li, Yuchen
    Zhang, Tongyu
    Shi, Huaizhang
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (02) : 330 - 337