What can we learn from consumption-based carbon footprints at different spatial scales? Review of policy implications

被引:71
作者
Ottelin, Juudit [1 ]
Ala-Mantila, Sanna [2 ]
Heinonen, Jukka [3 ]
Wiedmann, Thomas [4 ]
Clarke, Jack [3 ]
Junnila, Seppo [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Built Environm, Espoo, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] UNSW Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
carbon footprint; input-output; consumption-based; policy; review; spatial scale; city; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; US HOUSEHOLDS; CO2; EMISSIONS; LIFE-STYLE;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ab2212
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Current climate change mitigation policies, including the Paris Agreement, are based on territorial greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting. This neglects the understanding of GHG emissions embodied in trade. As a solution, consumption-based accounting (CBA) that reveals the lifecycle emissions, including transboundary flows, is gaining support as a complementary information tool. CBA is particularly relevant in cities that tend to outsource a large part of their production-based emissions to their hinterlands. While CBA has so far been used relatively little in practical policymaking, it has been used widely by scientists. Methods and design: The purpose of this systematic review, which covers more than 100 studies, is to reflect the policy implications of consumption-based carbon footprint (CBCF) studies at different spatial scales. The review was conducted by reading through the discussion sections of the reviewed studies and systematically collecting the given policy suggestions for different spatial scales. We used both numerical and qualitative methods to organize and interpret the findings of the review. Review results and discussion: The motivation for the review was to investigate whether the unique consumption perspective of CBA leads to similarly unique policy features. We found that various carbon pricing policies are the most widely supported policy instrument in the relevant literature. However, overall, there is a shortage of discussion on policy instruments, since the policy discussions focus on policy outcomes, such as behavioral change or technological solutions. In addition, some policy recommendations are conflicting. Particularly, urban density and compact city policies are supported by some studies and questioned by others. To clarify the issue, we examined how the results regarding the relationship between urban development and the CBCF vary. The review provides a concise starting point for policymakers and future research by summarizing the timely policy implications.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   Consumption-based carbon accounting: does it have a future? [J].
Afionis, Stavros ;
Sakai, Marco ;
Scott, Kate ;
Barrett, John ;
Gouldson, Andy .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (01)
[2]   To each their own? The greenhouse gas impacts of intra-household sharing in different urban zones [J].
Ala-Mantila, Sanna ;
Ottelin, Juudit ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Junnila, Seppo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 135 :356-367
[3]   Relationship between urbanization, direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, and expenditures: A multivariate analysis [J].
Ala-Mantila, Sanna ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Junnila, Seppo .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 104 :129-139
[4]   Greenhouse Gas Implications of Urban Sprawl in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area [J].
Ala-Mantila, Sanna ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Junnila, Seppo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (10) :4461-4478
[5]   Climate policy and dependence on traded carbon [J].
Andrew, Robbie M. ;
Davis, Steven J. ;
Peters, Glen P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Taking stock of industrial ecology, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_8]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NORDIC EXPERIENCES S
[8]  
Athanassiadis A, 2016, PROD, V173, P112, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPR0.2016.10.068
[9]   The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom [J].
Baiocchi, Giovanni ;
Minx, Jan ;
Hubacek, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 14 (01) :50-72
[10]   Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study [J].
Barrett, John ;
Peters, Glen ;
Wiedmann, Thomas ;
Scott, Kate ;
Lenzen, Manfred ;
Roelich, Katy ;
Le Quere, Corinne .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (04) :451-470