Experimental investigation of forward osmosis process for boron removal from water

被引:27
作者
Bin Darwish, Nawaf [1 ]
Alkhudhiri, Abdullah [1 ]
AlAlawi, Abdulrahman [1 ]
AlRomaih, Hamad [1 ]
Hilal, Nidal [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz City Sci & Technol KACST, Natl Ctr Desalinat & Water Treatment Technol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, NYUAD Water Res Ctr, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Forward osmosis; boron rejection; boron solute flux; PSU membrane; Aquaporin (TM) membrane; FTS H2O (TM) membrane;
D O I
10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101570
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forward osmosis technology is one of the most rapidly developing processes of desalination and water treatment. The transport of boron in forward osmosis (FO) using various FO membranes was investigated in this study. Three specific membranes - an FTS H2O (TM) membrane, a PSU membrane and an Aquaporin Inside (TM) membrane - were applied to study the impact of the feed solution (FS) pH, boron concentration, and draw solution (DS) concentration on boron solute flux, boron rejection and water flux. The results indicated an increment in boron solute flux with increasing DS and boron concentration but a reduction with increasing FS pH. Moreover, increasing the FS pH from 4 to 10 enhanced the rejection rate of boron from 12% to 90% for the FTS H2O (TM) membrane, from 8% to 84% for the PSU membrane and from 8% to 76% for the Aquaporin Inside (TM) membrane. With increment in the DS concentration from 0.5 to 3 M, the rejection rate of boron increased from 20% to 54% for the FTS H2O (TM) membrane, from 14% to 50% for the PSU membrane and from 8% to 40% for the Aquaporin Inside (TM) membrane. Apparently, increasing the boron concentration in the FS did not have a significant effect on boron rejection. The boron rejection rate was approximately 20-30% for the Aquaporin Inside (TM) membrane, 32-40% for the FTS H2O (TM) membrane and 25-35% for the PSU membrane.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Defect-free highly selective polyamide thin-film composite membranes for desalination and boron removal [J].
Ali, Zain ;
Al Sunbul, Yasmeen ;
Pacheco, Federico ;
Ogieglo, Wojciech ;
Wang, Yingge ;
Genduso, Giuseppe ;
Pinnau, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2019, 578 :85-94
[2]   Comparative performance of FO-RO hybrid and two-pass SWRO desalination processes: Boron removal [J].
Ban, Se-Hyeon ;
Im, Sung-Ju ;
Cho, Jaeweon ;
Jang, Am .
DESALINATION, 2019, 471
[3]   Microfiltration of micro-sized suspensions of boron-selective resin with PVDF membranes [J].
Bin Darwis, Nawaf ;
Kochkodan, Victor ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2017, 403 :161-171
[4]  
Cotton F.A., 1988, Advanced inorganic chemistry
[5]   Boron transport through polyamide-based thin film composite forward osmosis membranes [J].
Fam, Winny ;
Phuntsho, Sherub ;
Lee, Jong Hwa ;
Cho, Jaeweon ;
Shon, Ho Kyong .
DESALINATION, 2014, 340 :11-17
[6]   Biomimetic membranes: A critical review of recent progress [J].
Giwa, A. ;
Hasan, S. W. ;
Yousuf, A. ;
Chakraborty, S. ;
Johnson, D. J. ;
Hilal, N. .
DESALINATION, 2017, 420 :403-424
[7]   Boron removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption - A review [J].
Guan, Zhimin ;
Lv, Jiafei ;
Bai, Peng ;
Guo, Xianghai .
DESALINATION, 2016, 383 :29-37
[8]   Boron removal from seawater: State-of-the-art review [J].
Guler, Enver ;
Kaya, Cuneyt ;
Kabay, Nalan ;
Arda, Muserref .
DESALINATION, 2015, 356 :85-93
[9]   Solute Coupled Diffusion in Osmotically Driven Membrane Processes [J].
Hancock, Nathan T. ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (17) :6769-6775
[10]   Boron removal from saline water: A comprehensive review [J].
Hilal, N. ;
Kim, G. J. ;
Somerfield, C. .
DESALINATION, 2011, 273 (01) :23-35