Different feed withdrawal times before slaughter influence caecal fermentation and faecal Salmonella shedding in pigs

被引:26
作者
Martin-Pelaez, Sandra [1 ]
Peralta, Bibiana [2 ]
Creus, Eva [1 ]
Dalmau, Antonio [3 ]
Velarde, Antonio [3 ]
Perez, Jose F. [1 ]
Mateu, Enric [2 ,4 ]
Martin-Orue, Susana M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Anim Nutr Management & Welf Res Grp, Dept Ciencia Anim & Aliments, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] Ctr Recerca Sanitat Anim CReSA, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[3] IRTA, Monells 17121, Girona, Spain
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Sanitat & Anat Anim, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
关键词
Caecal fermentation; Enterobacteriaceae; Feed withdrawal; Pigs; Salmonella; CHAIN FATTY-ACIDS; ANTAGONISTIC ACTIVITY; IN-VITRO; TYPHIMURIUM; LACTOBACILLI; SWINE; COLONIZATION; VOLATILE; CARCASS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.08.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The effects of different pre-slaughter feed withdrawal times (FWT) on the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) weight and the gut environment of pigs and Salmonella shedding were investigated Trial I evaluated the effects Under experimental conditions (feed withdrawal for 18, 30 and 36 h) and trial 2 under commercial conditions ( 15 and 30 11). In trial 1, the GIT weight tended to decrease (P = 0 07). the caecal pH increased (P < 00001), short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) decreased (P < 0001) and percentage of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) increased as FWT increased. Similar results were observed in trial 2. but Enterobacteriaceae numbers and Salmonella positive pigs tended to increase whereas lactobacilli decreased (P < 0 0005) as FWT increased. The increase in FWT involved changes in the gut microbial ecosystem that could be associated with the trend of increased caecal Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella in faeces, and may represent a higher risk of carcass contamination in cases of laceration of viscera. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 473
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Suggestions for the construction, analysis and use of descriptive epidemiological models for the modernization of meat inspection [J].
Berends, BR ;
vanKnapen, F ;
Snijders, JMA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 30 (1-2) :27-36
[2]  
Castell-Perez M.E., 2004, Preharvest and postharvest food safety, V1st, P337, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470752579.CH25
[3]   Quantification of total bacteria, enterobacteria and lactobacilli populations in pig digesta by real-time PCR [J].
Castillo, M ;
Martín-Orúe, SM ;
Manzanilla, EG ;
Badiola, I ;
Martín, M ;
Gasa, J .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 114 (1-2) :165-170
[4]  
CREUS E, 2007, REV ASOCIACION PORCI, V33, P4
[5]  
Diebold G, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P2647
[6]   EFFECTS OF FEED WITHDRAWAL BEFORE DELIVERY ON PORK QUALITY AND CARCASS YIELD [J].
EIKELENBOOM, G ;
BOLINK, AH ;
SYBESMA, W .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1991, 29 (01) :25-30
[7]  
Ewing W.N., 1994, LIVING GUT INTRO MIC, P45
[8]   Effects of lairage temperature and holding time on pig behaviour and on carcass and meat quality [J].
Fraqueza, MJ ;
Roseiro, LC ;
Almeida, J ;
Matias, E ;
Santos, C ;
Randall, JM .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1998, 60 (04) :317-330
[9]   IMPORTANCE OF LACTOBACILLI IN MAINTAINING NORMAL MICROBIAL BALANCE IN CROP [J].
FULLER, R .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1977, 18 (01) :85-94
[10]  
Gantois I, 2006, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V72, P946, DOI 10.1128/AEM.72.1.946-949.2006