Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies

被引:231
作者
Clark, Beth [1 ]
Stewart, Gavin B. [1 ]
Panzone, Luca A. [1 ]
Kyriazakis, Ilias [1 ]
Frewer, Lynn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Systematic review; Animal production diseases; Willingness-to-pay; Farm animal welfare policy; Policy options; PEOPLES WILLINGNESS; ATTITUDES; MEAT; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; PROGRAMS; BEHAVIOR; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.006
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The sustainable intensification of animal production systems is increasing as a consequence of increased demand for foods originating from animals. Production diseases are particularly endemic in intensive production systems, and can negatively impact upon farm animal welfare. There is an increasing need to develop policies regarding animal production diseases, sustainable intensification, and animal welfare which incorporate consumer priorities as well as technical assessments of farm animal welfare. Consumers and/or citizens may have concerns about intensive production systems, and whether animal production disease represent a barrier to consumer acceptance of their increased use. There is a considerable body of research focused on consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improved animal welfare. It is not clear how this relates specifically to a preference for reduced animal production disease incidence in animal production systems. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to establish the publics' WTP for farm animal welfare, with a focus on production diseases which arise in intensive systems. Systematic review methodology combined with data synthesis was applied to integrate existing knowledge regarding consumer WTP for animal welfare, and reduced incidence of animal production diseases. Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant studies. A screening process, using a set of predetermined inclusion criteria, identified 54 studies, with the strength of evidence and uncertainty for each study being assessed. A random effects meta-analysis was used to explore heterogeneity in relation to a number of factors, with a cumulative meta-analysis conducted to establish changes in WTP over time. The results indicated a small, positive WTP (0.63 standard deviations) for farm animal welfare varying in relation to a number of factors including animal type and region. Socio-demographic characteristics explained the most variation in the data. An evidence gap was highlighted in relation to reduced WTP for specific production diseases associated with the intensification of production, with only 4 of the 54 studies identified being related to this. A combination of market and government based policy solutions appears to be the best solution for improving farm animal welfare standards in the future, enabling the diverse public preferences to be taken into consideration. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 127
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HIST INFL FRANC CPI
[2]  
[Anonymous], EAAE 2008 C PEOPL FO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CONSUMER ISSUES DEMA
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPEC EUR 270
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, R: A language for environment for statistical computing
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONS PRIC INC INFL C
[7]  
[Anonymous], PRIS9 CONS PRIC IND
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GUID PREP REV PROT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ANIMAL WELFARE EC PO
[10]  
[Anonymous], WAITROSE MILK COWS B