The Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes After Knee Cartilage Repair

被引:50
作者
Chahal, Jaskarndip [1 ,2 ]
Lansdown, Drew A. [1 ,3 ]
Davey, Annabelle [1 ,4 ]
Davis, Aileen M. [1 ,5 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Orthopaed Sports Med Program, 7430-76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Midwest Orthopaed, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
clinically important difference; Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State; patient-reported outcome measures; cartilage restoration; cartilage repair; knee;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520969883
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In patients undergoing cartilage restoration of the knee, limited information is available regarding clinically important difference (CID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) estimates for commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the CID and PASS in the population with knee cartilage restoration for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) score, and the Lysholm score. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, patients who underwent a cartilage restoration procedure were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm, all of which were scored from 0 to 100, and completed relevant anchor questions at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine CID and PASS cutoff points. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of age, sex, and baseline score on likelihood of achieving CID and PASS. Results: Of the 113 patients enrolled, 53 (47%) were male, and the mean age was 36 years. The CID values for the PROMs were 10.7 for KOOS Symptoms, 8.3 for KOOS Pain, 8.8 for KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 30.0 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 18.8 for KOOS Quality of Life (QOL), 9.2 for IKDC, and 13.0 for Lysholm. The PASS values were 71.5 for KOOS Symptoms, 72.2 for KOOS Pain, 86.8 for KOOS ADL, 43.8 for KOOS Sports and Recreation, 50.0 for KOOS QOL, 62.1 for IKDC, and 70.0 for Lysholm. Patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to achieve PASS for the IKDC (odds ratio, 2.28; P = .03). Baseline score did not have an effect on the likelihood of achieving CID. Younger age was an independent predictor of achieving PASS and CID across all outcomes (P < .05), but sex did not have such an effect. Conclusion: This study determined CID and PASS values for the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm scores among patients treated with knee cartilage restoration. Younger age was a positive prognostic variable, and higher baseline scores implied achieving PASS for the IKDC. The information in this study can be used in designing randomized controlled trials, counseling individual patients as to anticipated outcomes, and conducting responder analyses when evaluating new cartilage technology from a regulatory perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions
    Bekkers, J. E. J.
    de Windt, Th. S.
    Raijmakers, N. J. H.
    Dhert, W. J. A.
    Saris, D. B. F.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (11) : 1434 - 1439
  • [2] Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
    Copay, Anne G.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    Schuler, Thomas C.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) : 541 - 546
  • [3] Goksuluk D, 2016, R J, V8, P213
  • [4] Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in Patients With Focal Articular Cartilage Defects
    Greco, Nicholas J.
    Anderson, Allen F.
    Mann, Barton J.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Farr, Jack
    Nissen, Carl W.
    Irrgang, James J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (05) : 891 - 902
  • [5] MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
    JAESCHKE, R
    SINGER, J
    GUYATT, GH
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04): : 407 - 415
  • [6] King MT, 2011, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V11, P171, DOI [10.1586/ERP.11.9, 10.1586/erp.11.9]
  • [7] Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean?
    Kvien, Tore K.
    Heiberg, Turid
    Hagen, Kare B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 : 40 - 41
  • [8] Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Redondo, Michael L.
    Christian, David R.
    Cabarcas, Brandon C.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Cole, Brian J.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [9] Rehabilitation After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Athletes
    Nho, Shane J.
    Pensak, Michael J.
    Seigerman, Daniel A.
    Cole, Brian J.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (02) : 267 - +
  • [10] Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life - The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation
    Norman, GR
    Sloan, JA
    Wyrwich, KW
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (05) : 582 - 592