Private property and public interest in fisheries management: the Tasmanian rock lobster fishery

被引:19
作者
Phillips, G [1 ]
Kriwoken, L [1 ]
Hay, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog & Environm Studies, Ctr Environm Studies, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
fisheries; Tasmania; rent-seeking; public interest;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00026-X
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In 1998 a management system based on individual transferable quota (ITQ) was introduced in the Tasmanian rock lobster fishery. This marked the continuation of a management trend that has favoured economic efficiency at the cost of reduced employment and greater restrictions on access to the fishery. The authors discuss management trends in the fishery in the context of Tasmania's history, and social and political characteristics, which it is argued, have shaped development of Tasmania's resource management culture. Implications for social equality, economic well-being and environmental sustainability are discussed. In conclusion the difficulty of reforming policy that has been shaped by vested interests and which establishes rent-seeking activity is considered. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 469
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   A decade of ITQ-management in Icelandic fisheries:: consolidation without consensus [J].
Eythórsson, E .
MARINE POLICY, 2000, 24 (06) :483-492
[12]  
FORD W, 2000, 4042 FAO, P289
[13]  
HANNIBALSSON O, DARK SIDE QUOTA SYST
[14]  
HARRISON AJ, 1987, TASM ROCK LOBST SEM, P11
[15]   FACTORS CONDUCIVE TO POLITICAL CORRUPTION - TASMANIAN EXPERIENCE [J].
HAY, PR .
POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1977, 29 (02) :115-130
[16]  
Hay PR, 1991, B CTR TASMANIAN HIST, V3, P60
[17]  
HAY PR, 2000, STRANGE VERDANT POLI
[18]   Change without redistribution: an institutional perspective on South Africa's new fisheries policy [J].
Hersoug, B ;
Holm, P .
MARINE POLICY, 2000, 24 (03) :221-231
[19]  
HERSOUG B, 2000, 4042 FAO, P434
[20]   The community: a missing link of fisheries management [J].
Jentoft, S .
MARINE POLICY, 2000, 24 (01) :53-59