Image-quality metrics for characterizing adaptive optics system performance

被引:14
|
作者
Brigantic, RT
Roggemann, MC
Bauer, KW
Welsh, BM
机构
[1] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ENGN PHYS,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
[2] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ELECT & COMP ENGN,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
来源
APPLIED OPTICS | 1997年 / 36卷 / 26期
关键词
adaptive optics; atmospheric optics; image quality;
D O I
10.1364/AO.36.006583
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Adaptive optics system (AOS) performance is a function of the system design, seeing conditions, and light level of the wave-front beacon. It is desirable to optimize the controllable parameters in an AOS to maximize some measure of performance. For this optimization to be useful, it is necessary that a set of image-quality metrics be developed that vary monotonically with the AOS performance under a wide variety of imaging environments. Accordingly, as conditions change, one can be confident that the computed metrics dictate appropriate system settings that will optimize performance. Three such candidate metrics are presented. The first is the Strehl ratio; the second is a novel metric that modifies the Strehl ratio by integration of the modulus of the average system optical transfer function to a noise-effective cutoff frequency at which some specified image spectrum signal-to-noise ratio level is attained; and the third is simply the cutoff frequency just mentioned. It is shown that all three metrics are correlated with the rms error (RMSE) between the measured image and the associated diffraction-limited image. Of these, the Strehl ratio and the modified Strehl ratio exhibit consistently high correlations with the RMSE across a broad range of conditions and system settings. Furthermore, under conditions that yield a constant average system optical transfer function, the modified Strehl ratio can still be used to delineate image quality, whereas the Strehl ratio cannot.
引用
收藏
页码:6583 / 6593
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Image-quality criteria in the digital holography of particles
    Dyomin, V. V.
    Kamenev, D. V.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 79 (04) : 208 - 211
  • [42] Image-Quality Focusing of Rotating SAR Targets
    Rigling, Brian D.
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2008, 5 (04) : 750 - 754
  • [43] Performance of a compact adaptive-optics system
    Frazier, BW
    Smith, M
    Tyson, RK
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2004, 43 (22) : 4281 - 4287
  • [44] Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors
    Ravikumar, Ayeswarya
    Marsack, Jason D.
    Bedell, Harold E.
    Shi, Yue
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (13):
  • [45] MUTUAL CORRELATION OF NUMERICAL CRITERIA FOR IMAGE-QUALITY EVALUATION
    BOBROV, ST
    GREISUKH, GI
    OPTIKA I SPEKTROSKOPIYA, 1985, 58 (05): : 1068 - 1073
  • [46] Image-Quality Perception as a Function of Dose in Digital Radiography
    Lehnert, Thomas
    Naguib, Nagy N. N.
    Korkusuz, Huedayi
    Bauer, Ralf W.
    Kerl, J. Matthias
    Mack, Martin G.
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) : 1399 - 1403
  • [47] A comparative study of fingerprint image-quality estimation methods
    Alonso-Fernandez, Fernando
    Fierrez, Julian
    Ortega-Garcia, Javier
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin
    Fronthaler, Hartwig
    Kollreider, Klaus
    Bigun, Josef
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2007, 2 (04) : 734 - 743
  • [48] IMPACT OF SUBJECTIVE DATASET ON THE PERFORMANCE OF IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    Tourancheau, Sylvain
    Autrusseau, Florent
    Sazzad, Z. M. Parvez
    Horita, Yuukou
    2008 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 365 - 368
  • [49] THE COMPUTER AS A CAMERA-OPERATION AND IMAGE-QUALITY MANAGER
    VANROESSEL, FJ
    TIENKAMP, E
    SMPTE JOURNAL, 1987, 96 (11): : 1079 - 1086
  • [50] Characteristic functionals in imaging and image-quality assessment: tutorial
    Clarkson, Eric
    Barrett, Harrison H.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2016, 33 (08) : 1464 - 1475